A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement
By H. Coates. 2007
476 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88caf87ab1ca954fb8fccbe67c440be0363270d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Melissa Bond
- Lisa R. Halverson
- Vicki Trowler
- Carlos Delgado Kloos
- María-Blanca Ibáñez-Espiga
- Charles R. Graham
- Armando P. Delfino
- Ya-Juan Gan
In Education
- Melissa Bond
- Lisa R. Halverson
- Charles R. Graham
- Ya-Juan Gan
- Juan Zhang
- Ling-Yan Yang
- Jianpeng Guo
- Vicki Trowler
Citations in the corpus
- Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement (2011, background): “In an attempt to address this complexity, Coates and colleagues (Coates, 2007; Krause & Coates, 2008) have modelled social engagement and academic engagement as two orthogonal dimensions of the engagement space.”
- Gamification for Engaging Computer Science Students in Learning Activities: A Case Study (2014, background): “Cognitive engagement is also closely related to strategies students use in order to solve a problem or understand a concept [43], [44].”
- The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Classroom Engagement in Teaching English. (2018, background): “Coates (2007) emphasize the importance of active and collaborative learning, academic activities, effective communication with the teacher and educational experiences within the scope of classroom engagement.”
- Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review (2020, background): “Each engagement dimension includes several indicators of student engagement and disengagement (see Appendix B), which fluctuate on a continuum (Coates, 2007; Payne, 2017), depending on their activation (high or low) and valence (positive or negative) (Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2012).”
- Framing student engagement in higher education (2013, background): “New models of engagement are also being proposed, such as Coates’ (2007) four way typology of student engagement styles – intense, collaborative, independent and passive – linked to the common distinction between social and academic engagement.”
- An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education (2018, methodology): “We are cognizant that others have produced conceptual frameworks about engagement (e.g., Coates, 2007; Lawson & Lawson, 2013), but this one is different in that it draws on a systematic analysis of literature about the field, using the Framework Method of Gale, Heath, Cameron, Rashid, and Redwood…”
- STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS OF PARTIDO STATE UNIVERSITY (2019, background): “Coates (2007) stressed that there is growing recognition of the importance of understanding student engagement and the problem of disengagement in tertiary institutions.”
- Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework (2019, methodology): “Coates (2007) applied the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) to online as well as more “general campus-based engagement” (p. 121) but narrowly limited online learning to the use of learning management systems.”
- Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: relationships and causal ordering (2021, background): “The results not only confirm the important role of engagement in learning as suggested by previous research (Coates, 2007; Fredricks et al., 2004) but also address the distinction between antecedents, engagement, and consequences considered as the dominant limitations of current engagement research…”
- Student engagement evidence summary (2010, background): “8 Student engagement evidence summary Academic challenge is central to the engagement construct (NSSE, 2002, 10) and some disciplines are experienced as more challenging than others (see Pascarella, 2001; Coates and Ainley, 2007; Marks and Coates 2007) .”
- Student engagement literature review (2010, background): “Academic challenge is central to the engagement construct (NSSE 2002, 10) and some disciplines are experienced as more challenging than others (see Pascarella participating in a learning 2001, Coates & Ainley 2007; Marks & Coates 2007) .”
- Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity (2016, unknown): “As a whole, this picture supports the contention of Coates (2007) that we have a good understanding of ways in which specific forms of 204 P.”