How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence
By Malte Schwinger, R. Steinmayr, Birgit Spinath. 2009
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8769fc92801fc03527bd5f545ead87c524eaee44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- David B. Miele
- Abigail A. Scholer
- M. Hussain
- Heoncheol Yun
- Sanghoon Park
- Maria B. Benzon
- Malte Schwinger
- C. Wolters
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- David B. Miele
- Abigail A. Scholer
- M. Hussain
- Maria B. Benzon
- Malte Schwinger
- C. Wolters
- M. Boekaerts
- Heoncheol Yun
In Social Psychology
- David B. Miele
- Abigail A. Scholer
- Heoncheol Yun
- Sanghoon Park
- Maria B. Benzon
- Rob L. Martens
- K. Smit
- Malte Schwinger
Citations in the corpus
- Which one works best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies (2017, background): “Findings from these studies have indicated that motivational regulation strategies have only weak, if any, direct effects on achievement (Schwinger et al., 2009; Schwinger, Steinmayr, & Spinath, 2012; Wolters, 1998, 1999).”
- Assessing and Predicting College Students’ Use of Strategies for the Self-Regulation of Motivation (2013, background): “Later, Schwinger et al. (2009) found evidence that this extended German version of the motivational regulation survey produced equivalent scales for high school students.”
- The Role of Metamotivational Monitoring in Motivation Regulation (2018, methodology): “Studies using these questionnaires have shown that the subscales have good reliability and predictive validity (Grunschel, Schwinger, Steinmayr, & Fries, 2016; Schwinger & Otterpohl, 2017; Schwinger et al., 2009; Schwinger & Stiensmeier-Pelster, 2012).”
- The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement (2018, methodology): “The second section contained the MRS instrument developed by Schwinger et al. (2009) building on the work of Wolters (2003).”
- Personal and Social-Contextual Factors in K–12 Academic Performance: An Integrative Perspective on Student Learning (2010, background): “For instance, Borkowski and his colleagues ( Borkowski, Johnston, & Reid, 1986 ; Borkowski & Krause, 1985 ) studied motivational constructs (eg, attributional beliefs, self-efficacy, self-regulation, and motivation), which have emerged as agents to internalize, activate, and execute one's own learn”
- An Investigation of the Relationship between Students' Motivation and Academic Performance as Mediated by Effort (2011, background): “Furthermore, the studies that have been conducted in the field of motivation focus on either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation independently, while few studies consider both types of motivation simultaneously (Dass-Brailsford, 2005; Davis et al., 2006; Muller & Louw, 2004; Schwinger et al., 2009).”
- The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning (2017, background): “They also added the setting of proximal goals as a motivational strategy (Schwinger et al., 2009).”