A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance

By T. M. Tripp, R. Bies, Karl Aquino. 2007

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/873b2e68ffd2b71326f576c2dbf2009874da2152

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Customer forgiveness following service failures (2016, background): “In this way, norm violations can be perceived as unfair actions, which motivate revenge and impede forgiveness [23,24].”
A Model of Third Parties' Morally Motivated Responses to Mistreatment in Organizations (2011, background): “system, like society’s criminal justice system, reduces the burden on individual citizens to enforce community standards of moral behavior, thereby tempering vigilante behavior (Aquino, Tripp, & Bies, 2001; Tripp et al., 2007).”
Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective (2010, background): “We do not, however, treat these negative outcomes of bullying as merely deliberate retaliation or negative reciprocal actions (for revenge and retaliation literature see Skarlicki and Folger, 1997; Tripp et al., 2007).”
Developing and Testing a Dynamic Model of Workplace Incivility Change (2017, methodology): “Following Vandenberg and Lance’s (2000) recommendations, we initially examined an unconstrained measurement model, in which the factor loadings and indicator intercepts were allowed to be different across the 6 weeks.”
A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power (2010, background): “Based on the workplace literature (Aquino et al. 2006; Tripp et al., 2007), we suggest that low-power customers are reluctant to engage in direct revenge because of a fear of counter-retaliation.”
Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance (2012, background): “Such treatment derogates the victim’s status and standing (Bies & Tripp, 2005; Tripp et al., 2007); as a result, victims may attribute blame toward the source of the esteem threat and desire revenge or retaliation for subjecting the victim to an aversive state of decreased self-esteem (Crocker &…”