Using an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group citizenship behaviours

By A. Day, Sarah A. Carroll. 2004

544 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8498c6cab47d638d878ebc95fe2222c1bb9952ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Comparing the Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of Ability-Based and Mixed-Model Measures of Emotional Intelligence (2005, methodology): “Conversely, initial research on the MSCEIT indicates that it tends to have low or statistically nonsignificant correlations with personality (Barchard, 2001; Day & Carroll, 2004).”
Emotional Intelligence, its Measurement and Implications for the Workplace (2008, background): “In addition, Day and Carroll (2004), in comparing differences in MESCIT scores between men and women, found evidence of a gender bias and no evidence to support the developmental relationship between age and EI.”
Gender and emotion in context. (2008, background): “Women score higher on all of these components on the Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (Day & Carroll, 2004; Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 2000).”
Culture's Influence on Emotional Intelligence: An Empirical Study of Nine Countries (2014, result): “While previous research suggests that women score higher on EI (e.g., Day and Carroll, 2004; Mandell and Pherwani, 2003; Van Rooy et al., 2005), our results show that the influence of gender depends on the dimension of EI.”
Relationship marketing: The impact of emotional intelligence and trust on bank performance (2008, result): “Additionally, a number of other studies have found support for the MSCEIT's fit with the four-factor EI model ( Day and Carroll, 2004”
Predicting school success: Comparing Conscientiousness, Grit, and Emotion Regulation Ability (2014, background): “Defined as maximal performance, ERA is a component of emotional intelligence and distinct from personality traits (Brackett & Mayer, 2003; Day & Carroll, 2004).”
ON WHY “EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE” WILL NOT PREDICT LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS BEYOND IQ OR THE “BIG FIVE”: AN EXTENSION AND REJOINDER (2004, background): “…proposed by Prati et al. (2003) was strongly predicted (i.e., multiple correlation of .81) by "g", agreeableness (a dimension of personality measured by the I),-^ and gender (see also Day & Carroll, 2004, and O'Connor & Little, 2003, which do not demonstrate positive findings for the MSCEIT).”
An Evaluation of Construct Validity: What Is This Thing Called Emotional Intelligence? (2005, unknown): “Initial studies have shown that EI scores increase with age (Bar-On, 1997; Day & Carroll, 2004; Mayer, Caruso, et al., 1999; Van Rooy, Alonso, & Viswesvaran, 2005), but others have reported nonsignificant differences (Roberts et al., 2001).”
The influence of emotional intelligence on performance (2005, unknown): “They found EP alone was related to better performance (Day & Carroll, 2004).”
Perceived organizational politics, emotional intelligence and work outcomes: Empirical exploration of direct and indirect effects (2014, background): “…transformational leadership, conflict resolution, success in job interviews, job performance, perceived organizational justice, and job satisfaction (Day and Carroll, 2004; Joseph and Newman, 2010; Mayer et al., 2008; Meisler, 2012a; O’Boyle et al., 2011; Sy et al., 2006; Wong and Law, 2002).”
The ability model of emotional intelligence: Searching for valid measures (2011, background): “Several studies (e.g., Day & Carroll, 2004; Roberts t al., 2006; Rode et al., 2008) tested the claim that EI is distinct from general intelligence and personality (Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 1999).”
The effects of emotional intelligence, age, work experience, and academic performance. (2010, methodology): “In a study conducted by Day and Carroll (2004), experience was positively correlated with three of the four emotional intelligence scales, as measured by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test.”
Emotional intelligence and counterpart mood induction in a negotiation (2006, result): “Whereas previous studies have found that emotional intelligence relates to correlates of one’s own social functioning, including self-reported organizational citizenship behaviors (Day and Carroll, 2004) and lower levels of self-reported antagonism towards a close friend (Lopes et al.”