The ability model of emotional intelligence: Searching for valid measures

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emotional intelligence: A promise unfulfilled? (2012, unknown): “Although some psychometric issues remain (Fiori & Antonakis, 2011), for the most part it seems that the MEIS and MSCEIT tests assess elements of emotional functioning beyond those picked up by conventional ability and personality measures.”
Leadership and individual differences: At the cusp of a renaissance (2012, background): “…enough (K. Lee & Ashton, 2004, 2008), whether big-five type inventories are casting too long a shadow over other individual differences that could also contribute to predicting outcomes (Day & Schleicher, 2006), and whether alternative conceptions of intelligence matter (Fiori & Antonakis, 2011).”
Emotional Intelligence as an Ability: Theory, Challenges, and New Directions (2018, methodology): “The four-branch model has also been challenged through factor analysis in several cases, which did not support a hierarchical model with one underlying global EI factor (Fiori & Antonakis, 2011; Rossen, Kranzler, & Algina, 2008).”
Convergent and divergent validity of integrative versus mixed model measures of emotional intelligence (2013, unknown): “The divergent validity of the MSCEIT has also been questioned, with studies reporting significant associations between the latter measure, key personality dimensions, and general intelligence (e.g., Schulte, Ree, & Carretta, 2004; Fiori & Antonakis, 2011).”