TARGET ARTICLE WITH COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions

By Johannes C. Ziegler, Usha Goswami. 2006

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8468748131085d2e69363d56ae8af54800eedbbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: within and cross-language effects on word reading (2010, background): “Because of the phonological transparency of Spanish, researchers have emphasized the importance of phonological recoding in Spanish word reading (e.g., Goswami et al., 1998; Signorini, 1997; Ziegler & Goswami, 2006 ).”
The Role of Vocabulary in the Context of the Simple View of Reading (2013, background): “Studies of languages varying in orthographic transparency suggest that more transparent orthographies facilitate earlier development and more efficient use of sublexical processes for reading (Ziegler & Goswami, 2005, 2006).”
Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? (2006, background): “Theoretically motivated studies across languages are now require”
On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography. (2008, background): “…theories of reading that look beyond the English language (see, e.g., Frost, 2005; Katz & Frost, 1992; Perfetti, Liu, & Tan, 2005; Seymour, 2006; Ziegler & Goswami, 2005, 2006); nonetheless, it is becoming clear that there are fundamental differences between orthographies and that a complete…”
Individual Differences in Reading Development (2014, unknown): “Languages were subsequently grouped according to their orthographic consistency (cf., Seymor, Aro, & Erskine, 2003; Ziegler et al., 2010; Ziegler & Goswami, 2006) in languages with relatively consistent grapheme-phoneme relations (e.g., Dutch, German, Finnish, and Swedish) and with relatively…”
Cognitive Development of Fluent Word Reading Does Not Qualitatively Differ Between Transparent and Opaque Orthographies (2010, background): “…nonlinguistic differences exist between countries, such as instructional methods (Rayner, Foorman, Perfetti, Pesetsky, & Seidenberg, 2001; Ziegler & Goswami, 2006), school support systems (Blomert, 2009; Ise et al., in press), and economic status of a country and parental education,…”