The Reliability and Validity of Curriculum-based Measurement Readiness Probes for Kindergarten Students

By A. Vanderheyden, Josepha Witt, Gale M. Naquin, G. Noell. 2001

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84041e07cd021d7a539fc734a0d6bb26eafcd449

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. A. Foegen
2. Randy G. Floyd
3. Erica S. Lembke
4. Pamela M. Seethaler
5. Robin L. Hojnoski
6. Jennifer M. Key
7. Lynn S. Fuchs
8. R. Vukovic

Citations in the corpus

• The Predictive Utility of Kindergarten Screening for Math Difficulty (2010, background): “Yet authors also reported outcomes such as teacher ratings (Simner, 1982) and other professional judgments of academic difficulties (VanDerHeyden et al., 2001).”
• Identifying Early Numeracy Indicators for Kindergarten and First–Grade Students (2009, background): “Of the remaining studies, all included first-grade students, with the exception of VanDerHeyden et al. (2001).”
• Preliminary Evidence of the Technical Adequacy of the Preschool Numeracy Indicators (2006, methodology): “Such counting tasks were included in 4 studies (Joyce & Wolking, 1987; Magliocca et al., 1977; VanDerHeyden et al., 2004; VanDerHeyden et al., 2001).”