Preliminary Evidence of the Technical Adequacy of the Preschool Numeracy Indicators

By Randy G. Floyd, Robin L. Hojnoski, Jennifer M. Key. 2006

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44b409d802d9ba25b337e1956bd89413ecfffffc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Methe
2. Randy G. Floyd
3. M. Eiland
4. John M. Hintze
5. A. Baroody
6. David J. Purpura
7. E. E. Reid
8. Grace I. L. Caskie

In Education

1. S. Methe
2. Randy G. Floyd
3. John M. Hintze
4. A. Baroody
5. M. Eiland
6. E. E. Reid
7. Patrick Repasky
8. David J. Purpura

In Statistics and Probability

1. S. Methe
2. M. Eiland
3. Randy G. Floyd
4. John M. Hintze
5. A. Baroody
6. E. E. Reid
7. David J. Purpura
8. Patrick Repasky

Citations in the corpus

• Validation and Decision Accuracy of Early Numeracy Skill Indicators (2008, methodology): “This study is aligned with the recommendation of Fuchs (2004), who suggested examining technical properties of the static score using methods such as criterion validation and reliability analyses.”
• Using a Brief Preschool Early Numeracy Skills Screener to Identify Young Children With Mathematics Difficulties (2015, result): “Critically, the age-related differences found in this study stand in contrast to other studies using discrete skill measures (e.g., Floyd et al., 2006), in which it was found that it was not possible to distinguish the performance of 3 and 4 year olds.”
• Home Numeracy Environments of Preschoolers: Examining Relations Among Mathematical Activities, Parent Mathematical Beliefs, and Early Mathematical Skills (2015, methodology): “A test–retest reliability coefficient of .91 was found across a 2- to 4-week interval (Floyd et al., 2006).”