The Predictive Utility of Kindergarten Screening for Math Difficulty

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Math Shelf: A Randomized Trial of a Prekindergarten Tablet Number Sense Curriculum (2016, methodology): “Seethaler and Fuchs (2010) used a similar numeral sequencing task as part of their number sense battery.”
Mathematics Difficulty with and without Reading Difficulty: Findings and Implications from a Four-Year Longitudinal Study (2012, methodology): “For example, Powell et al. (2009) use the 25th percentile, Seethaler and Fuchs (2010) use the 15th percentile, and Jordan et al. (2003) use the 35th percentile.”
Universal Screening in Mathematics for the Primary Grades: Beginnings of a Research Base (2012, methodology): “(Seethaler and Fuchs, 2010, used a single proficiency measure, a multiple proficiency measure, and diagnostic utility statistics.”
The Developmental Relationship Between Language and Low Early Numeracy Skills Throughout Kindergarten (2014, methodology): “The selection criterion in the present study (< 15th percentile) was deliberately chosen on the basis of previous research (Desoete et al., 2004; Seethaler & Fuchs, 2010) and can be understood as strict.”
The Use of a Bar Model Drawing to Teach Word Problem Solving to Students With Mathematics Difficulties (2017, background): “Procedural skills involve computational fluency or fact retrieval, whereas conceptual skills involve number sense or problem-solving skills (Seethaler & Fuchs, 2010).”