Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers

By Ian R. Gellatly, Gregory P. Irving. 2001

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/821bbadc86cce50bf155afa3c955e284b2157fd8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Investigating the influences of core self‐evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in‐role job performance (2010, background): “Furthermore, several studies (e.g., Gellatly & Irving, 2001; George & Jones, 1997; Morrison, 1994) suggested that job autonomy is more closely related to extrarole (contextual) performance than in-role performance in that employees in less-autonomous work environments tend to focus more on…”
Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance (2004, unknown): “While task autonomy was related to contextual performance, another term for extra-role performance (Gellalty & Irving, 2001), organizational support did not foster organizational citizenship behavior in the study of Lambert (2000).”
Autonomy in the Workplace: An Essential Ingredient to Employee Engagement and Well-Being in Every Culture (2011, background): “Interestingly, having high job autonomy also enhances the relationship between one’s personality (as assessed through the Big 5) and job performance (Barrick & Mount, 1993) and extra-role performance (Gellatly & Irving, 2001).”
Yes, Personality Matters: Moving on to More Important Matters (2005, background): “…demonstrating that situational strength moderates the personality-behav- ior relation (Barrick & Mount, 1993; Beaty, Cleveland, & Murphy, 2001; Gellatly & Irving, 2001; Hochwarter, Witt, & Kacmar, 2000) underscores the idea that researchers must broadly account for situational affects to…”
Personality and career success (2007, background): “One study found that extroversion and agreeableness were positively related to contextual performance only when job autonomy was high (Gellatly & Irving, 2001).”
Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance. (2005, unknown): “Numerous studies have shown that situations can restrict the extent to which an individual can behave in accordance with his or her personality (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1993; Beaty, Cleveland, & Murphy, 2001; Gellatly & Irving, 2001; Hochwarter, Witt, & Kacmar, 2000).”
The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? (2006, background): “In a study reported by Gellatly and Irving (2001), autonomy moderated the relationships between other personality traits with the contextual performance of managers.”
How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation (2010, unknown): “…O, C, E, A, N Furnham et al, 1999 Task/Technical/Overall Performance E, N Furnham & Stringfield, 1993 Task/Technical/Overall Performance E Gellatly & Irving, 2001 OCB/Contextual Performance C, E, A Goffin et al, 1996 Task/Technical/Overall Performance C, E Griffin & Hesketh, 2004…”