GENERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE: A TEST OF A GROUNDED THEORETICAL MODEL
By Michael J. Burke, S. A. Sarpy, Paul E. Tesluk, Kristin Smith-Crowe. 2002
305 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81d469b9413aa817644a60c11b6fa7feee5c2a11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Medical Laboratory Technology
In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Mark A. Griffin
- Michael J. Burke
- J. Nahrgang
- David Hofmann
- F. Morgeson
- Xiaowen Hu
- Andrew Neal
- S. A. Sarpy
In Statistics and Probability
- Mark A. Griffin
- Xiaowen Hu
- Michael J. Burke
- F. Morgeson
- Andrew Neal
- David Hofmann
- Rommel O. Salvador
- S. A. Sarpy
Citations in the corpus
- A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. (2006, background): “This is important because, as Burke, Sarpy, Tesluk, and Smith-Crowe (2002) have argued, the vast majority of studies have treated safety behavior as a unidimensional construct.”
- The role of national culture and organizational climate in safety training effectiveness (2008, background): “Prior to unfolding these discussions, we note that in this paper safety performance refers to the actions or behaviours that individuals exhibit in almost all jobs to promote the health and safety of workers, clients, the public, and the environment (Burke, Sarpy, Tesluk, & Smith-Crowe, 2002 ”
- How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: The role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning (2013, background): “Such conceptualisation of safety performance closely ties this construct to related psychological antecedents, and allows systematic evaluation of safety performance (Burke et al., 2002).”
- Safety Climate in Organizations (2016, unknown): “Similar to job performance in general, safety performance behaviors can be scaled by the frequency with which employees engage in the behaviors and are distinguishable in terms of their antecedents and covariation with safety outcomes (Burke et al. 2002).”
- Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. (2011, background): “Knowledge of safety fosters employee growth and learning in using personal protective equipment, safety work practices, and general health and safety (Burke et al., 2002).”
- Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. (2006, result): “We suspect that differences in the complexity of performance tasks, coupled with suboptimal measures of more complex tasks, influenced our results.(4,127) Our findings indicate that the most engaging methods of safety training are, on average, most effective in reducing negative outcomes such as acc”
- THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES (2005, background): “Studies by Burke, Sarpy, Tesluk, and Smith-Crowe (2002) on safety performance modeling or by de Jonge, Reuvers, Houtman, Bongers, and Kompier (2000) on linking health behaviors to employee absenteeism are a few examples of burgeoning interest in this area.”
- Assessment of relationships between work stress, work-family conflict, burnout and firefighter safety behavior outcomes (2018, methodology): “These items were derived from measures related to reporting and communication (Burke et al., 2002) and items related to communication and safety voice (Tucker et al.”