THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES

By B. Roberts, O. Chernyshenko, Stephen E. Stark, L. R. Goldberg. 2005

784 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dc3242b236313df5fe1e6392e2de4fb1cf796e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Same Same, but Different? Relations between Facets of Conscientiousness and Grit (2018, methodology): “…as indicators of two common factors, with the first factor representing a superordinate conscientiousness factor, FC (see Figure 2), and the second factor, FI, being specified as a nested factor (Brunner et al., 2012), representing the industriousness factor as proposed by Roberts et al. (2005).”
The power of play: The effects of Portal 2 and Lumosity on cognitive and noncognitive skills (2015, background): “(2010) suggest that persistence may drive the predictive validity of conscientiousness and is the facet that consistently predicts a variety of outcomes over other facets of conscientiousness (Dudley et al., 2006; Perry et al., 2010; Roberts et al., 2005).”
De‐investment in work and non‐normative personality trait change in young adulthood (2006, background): “In addition, these results could be folded into the burgeoning evidence that personality traits are actually influenced by the environment (Roberts et al., 2005), which contradicts a fundamental assumption of the Five Factor Model.”
Development of Indirect Measures of Conscientiousness: Combining a Facets Approach and Network Analysis (2015, background): “Previous studies showed that responsibility shares a portion of variance also with agreeableness (e.g. Roberts et al., 2004, 2005).”
A Conceptual Model of Social Entrepreneurial Intention Based on the Social Cognitive Career Theory (2016, background): “Conscientiousness represents a person’s level of achievement, work motivation, organization and planning, self-control and acceptance of traditional norms and virtue 25 Social cognitive career theory and responsibility to others (Costa and McCrae, 1995; Roberts et al., 2005).”
How personality and policy predict pandemic behavior: Understanding sheltering-in-place in 55 countries at the onset of COVID-19. (2020, background): “On the other hand, more conscientious people are also more industrious, dutiful, and self-disciplined (McCrae & John, 1992; Roberts et al., 2005), which may make them more likely to continue leaving their home in order to go to work (Judge, Martocchio, & Thoresen, 1997) and follow other aspects of t”