Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework
By Huiwen Lian, Douglas J. Brown, D. L. Ferris, L. Liang, Lisa M. Keeping, Rachel L. Morrison. 2014
274 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b6c1c970021dda881f225d28317fdde1ee7a55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self‐control and time with an interaction‐record diary study. (2015, methodology): “In line with this finding, high trait self-control has been related to lower levels of antisocial behavior at work (Lian et al., 2014; Marcus & Schuler, 2004).”
- An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression (2016, background): “…retaliation against the source of the anger, if such retaliatory behavior is not possible (e.g., due to the supervisor possessing coercive power [Lian et al., 2014a]), employees may redirect their approach-oriented energy into beneficial approach-related outcomes, such as increasing one’s…”
- Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “…abusive supervision, he or she may not retaliate against the supervisor because of the societal norms emboldening this type of supervisor behavior (Lian et al. 2014a, b) as well as the fear of strong retribution from the supervisor (Hoobler and Brass 2006; Mitchell and Ambrose 2007; Restubog et…”
- Power Imbalance and Employee Silence: The Role of Abusive Leadership, Power Distance Orientation, and Perceived Organisational Politics (2018, background): “Our findings show that when supervisors engage in abusive behaviours to demonstrate their power over subordinates (Aryee et al., 2007; Ashforth, 1994; Lian et al., 2014), subordinates tend to engage selfprotection in the form of defensive silence.”