Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature

By Robin H. Kay, Ann LeSage. Comput. Educ., 2009

728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f75c1245dc8aab77769c3b75834202f51ef49d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Media Technology

Citations in the corpus

Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review (2014, background): “There are reviews undertaken to synthesise findings relating to a particular technology (e.g. Naismith, et al. 2004; Kay & LeSage 2009; Sim & Hew 2010) or discipline area (e.g. Arbaugh et al. 2009; Papastergiou 2009).”
The effect of using Kahoot! for learning - A literature review (2020, background): “…and instructors, and positive effect on exams (Caldwell, 2007); students more likely to work on problems in class (Cutts, Kennedy, Mitchell, & Draper, 2004); increased student attendance (Burnstein & Lederman, 2001); and improving classroom environment, learning and assessment (Kay & LeSage, 2009).”
An Empirical Examination of the Educational Impact of Text Message-Induced Task Switching in the Classroom: Educational Implications and Strategies to Enhance Learning (2011, methodology): “Ophir et al. (2009) examined chronic heavy media multitaskers compared to light media multitaskers on a battery of tests requiring taskswitching such as identifying whether a number is odd when it is coupled with a letter distractor on the screen.”
Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance (2013, methodology): “Second, there is a noticeable lack of reliability and validity analysis of the measurement instruments used in prior studies, which makes it difficult to have a rigorous understanding of the phenomenon (Kay & LeSage, 2009).”
The wear out effect of a game-based student response system (2015, background): “In a more recent literature review from 2009, Kay and LeSage summarize the benefits of SRSs into the three areas Classroom environment, Learning, and Assessment (Kay and LeSage 2009).”
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014, background): “Instead, it may be more productive to focus on what we call “second-generation research”: using advances in educational psychology and cognitive science to inspire changes in course design (23, 24), then testing hypotheses about which type of active learning is most appropriate and efficient for cer”
Enhancing learning and teaching through technology: a table of resources for academics (2011, background): “…of L & T intervention No. of participants Country Research/evaluation method(s) Key findings Electronic voting/personal response systems Kay & LeSage (2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu .2009.05.001 General literature review Use of audience response systems with on-campus students Various –…”