Influences On Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter

By K. Andrews, B. Delahaye. 2000

574 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7715f964eb5bf5236c4b1aa507bbecd0d9a25370

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust (2012, background): “Interpersonal trust has been found to promote knowledge exchange (Andrews & Delahaye, 2000; Golden & Raghuram, 2010; Levin & Cross, 2004; Mäkelä & Brewster, 2009) and trust in leaders in particular has been linked to followers' feedback seeking from the leader (Hays & Williams, 2011).”
Building Collegial Information Networks: A Theory of Advice Network Generation (2006, background): “Andrews and Delahaye (2000) conclude that knowledge shar ing would not have occurred in the absence of affective trust in their studies of knowledge ex change among scientists.”
When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity (2004, unknown): “For more information, please contact scholarsarchive@byu.edu, ellen_amatangelo@byu.edu.”
The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. (2005, background): “Hence, with an effective sharing process an organization can develop its knowledgebase and competitiveness (Andrews and Delahaye, 2000; McEvily et al, 2000).”
Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework (2003, background): “This sense of ownership comes from the fact that in several settings, individual knowledge is linked to status, career prospects, and individual reputations (Andrews & Delahaye, 2000).”
Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance (2010, background): “Other studies show that trust creates emotional openness (Chowdhury, 2005) and enhances the extent to which people listen to and absorb others’ knowledge (Levin and Cross 2004; Mayer et al., 1995), and accept influence and share relevant knowledge (Andrews and Delahaye, 2002; Zand, 1972).”
The Influence of Project Commitment and Team Commitment on the Relationship between Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams (2017, background): “A vast amount of research has suggested that trust facilitates knowledge sharing (e.g., Andrews & Delahaye, 2000; Connelly & Kelloway, 2003; Holste & Fields, 2010; Inkpen & Tsang, 2005; Levin & Cross, 2004; McEvily et al., 2003; Zand, 1972).”
Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams (2008, background): “In particular, higher levels of trust improve knowledge integration by increasing the amount (Dirks and Ferrin 2002) and types of information exchanged (Andrews and Delahaye 2000).”
The relationship between high‐commitment HRM and knowledge‐sharing behavior and its mediators (2011, background): “Whitener (2001) found that perceived organizational support contributes to organizational trust through social exchange perspectives, and organizational trust contributes to knowledge-sharing behavior (Andrews and Delahaye, 2000).”
The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer (2002, background): “1995 for reviews) provides considerable evidence that trusting relationships lead to greater knowledge exchange: When trust exists, people are more willing to give useful knowledge (Andrews and Delahay 2000, Penley and Hawkins 1985, Tsai and Ghoshal 1998, Zand 1972) and are also more willing to list”
Repatriating knowledge: variables influencing the “transfer” process (2009, background): “It affects the sharing and acceptance of information (Andrews & Delahaye, 2000; Argote, McEvily, & Reagans, 2003; Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998).”
The ‘‘What’’ and ‘‘How’’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work (2010, methodology): “Data analysis and interpretation focused on the specific interview questions as well as on unanticipated issues that emerged from the data itself’’ (Andrews & Delahaye, 2000, p. 799).”