A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective

By M. Klijn, W. Tomic. 2010

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70a1bda320ff9e1733568650301a7d8c13b03090

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. H. Tayyeb
2. Surendra Arjoon
3. Fikret Sozbilir
4. Carla Susana Marques
5. Filipa Sousa
6. A. A. Khan
7. Arménio Rego
8. Miguel Pina e Cunha

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Tayyeb
2. Surendra Arjoon
3. Fikret Sozbilir
4. Carla Susana Marques
5. Filipa Sousa
6. A. A. Khan
7. Arménio Rego
8. Miguel Pina e Cunha

In Social Psychology

1. Arménio Rego
2. Miguel Pina e Cunha
3. Carla Susana Marques
4. Filipa Sousa
5. H. Tayyeb
6. Surendra Arjoon
7. Fikret Sozbilir
8. S. M. M. R. Naqvi

Citations in the corpus

• Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety (2017, background): “Studies have also found positive effects of PS for not only idea generation, but also promotion and implementation of newly generated ideas (Kark & Carmeli, 2009; Klijn & Tomic, 2010; Gong et al., 2012; Kessel, Kratzer, & Schultz, 2012; Sharifirad, 2013).”
• The interaction between social capital, creativity and efficiency in organizations (2018, background): “Although some researchers have pointed out that creativity can negatively affect efficiency (James, Clark, & Cropanzano, 1999; Klijn & Tomic, 2010), Woodman et al. (1993) proposed that “creativity for individuals and organizations – doing something for the first time anywhere or creating new…”
• Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship (2014, background): “Global competition, economic uncertainty, and rapid technological change make creativity, the “cornerstone of innovation” (Klijn & Tomic, 2010, p. 322), a crucial organizational resource and a path to organizational performance and survival (Reiter-Palmon & Illies, 2004; Shalley & Gilson, 2004;…”
• Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review (2020, unknown): “…in design (e.g., Anderson et al., 2014; Hughes et al., 2018; Mainemelis, Kark, & Epitropaki, 2015; Rank, Pace, & Frese, 2004; Reiter-Palmon & Illies, 2004; Zhou & Shalley, 2003) or provided theoretical overviews and identified “gaps” in the literature (Klijn & Tomic, 2010; Shalley & Gilson, 2004).”