An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking

By J. Strauss, Murray R. Barrick, M. Connerley. 2001

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6efd7b681f93dd2c8119fc2aaa2bd6033103e42a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Person–organization fit, OCB and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor–salesperson data set in a Spanish context☆ (2008, background): “There is also preliminary evidence showing that relationships between managers and co-workers (Erdogan, Kraimer & Liden, 2004; Strauss et al., 2001) and even job performance (Shaw & Gupta, 2004) may influence the nature of the fit-in construct, thus moderating its relationship with resulting…”
Political skill and influence effectiveness: Testing portions of an expanded Ferris and Judge (1991) model (2007, unknown): “Whereas some research has chosen to evaluate this concept on limited facets of similarity (i.e. personality; Strauss et al., 2001), most research has perceived similarity more generally.”
How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation (2010, unknown): “…al, 1996 Task/Technical/Overall Performance, OCB/Contextual Performance O, C, E, A, N Stewart & Nandkeolyar, 2006 Task/Technical/Overall Performance O, C Strauss et al, 2001 Task/Technical/Overall Performance C, E, N Strickland & Towler, 2005 Task/Technical/Overall Performance O, C, E, A, N Note.”
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future (2004, background): “In other words, the majority of the empirical work has focused on the psychometric properties of multi-source ratings (Conway & Huffcutt, 1997; Scullen, Mount & Judge, 2003), the correlations between ratings sources (Atkins & Wood, 2002; Beehr, Ivanitskaya, Hansen, Erofeev & Gudanowski, 2001;…”
Customers' need for uniqueness theory versus brand congruence theory: The impact on satisfaction with social network sites (2020, unknown): “Indeed, we tend to like people that we frequently interact with and who are similar to us (Strauss, Barrick, and Connerley, 2001; Byrne, 1971), leading to closeness (Laurenceau, Barrett, and Pietromonaco, 1998; Ledbetter et al., 2011; Park, Jin, and Jin, 2011; Valkenburg and Peter, 2007) and trust…”
The phenomenology of fit: linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. (2006, background): “…such as supervisors and subordinates (Cooper-Thomas et al., 2004; Dose, 1999; Engle & Lord, 1997; Liden et al., 1993; Murphy & Ensher, 1999; Strauss et al., 2001; Turban et al., 2002; Turban & Jones, 1988; Wayne & Liden, 1995), recruiters and job applicants (Adkins et al., 1994; Graves &…”
Perceived diversity and organizational performance (2007, background): “…perceptual diversity measures have examined diversity at the team level of analysis (Hobman et al., 2004; Kirchmeyer, 1995; Harrison et al., 1998; Harrison et al., 2002; Jehn et al., 1999) or dyad level of analysis (Orpen, 1984; Strauss et al., 2001; Turban and Jones, 1988; Wayne and Liden, 1995).”
Consequences of Feeling Dissimilar from Others in a Work Team (2003, background): “Research into supervisor/subordinate dyad differences have also demonstrated the positive association between objective dissimilarity and perceived dissimilarity ( Strauss, Barrick & Connerley, 2001; Wayne & Liden, 1995), and that the effects of perceived dissimilarity are stronger than the effects”
Does Place Matter When Shopping Online? Perceptions of Similarity and Familiarity as Indicators of Psychological Distance (2009, unknown): “We define retailer familiarity and brand familiarity conceptually as how well a person knows a company or brand (Strauss, Barrick, and Connerley 2001).”