A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Construct Validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale.

By N. Bowling, Gregory D. Hammond. 2008

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/645e09a4ead0995df6bc1ea8a32951e13826eb3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Work engagement as a mediator between employee attitudes and outcomes (2013, background): “…Questionnaire, a three-item measure of global job satisfaction (Cammann, Fichman, Jenkins and Klesh 1983), which has been meta-analysed and found to have acceptable reliability across the multitude of studies that have used the measure since it was first published (Bowling and Hammond 2008).”
Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates' responses to abusive supervision (2011, methodology): “” Meta-analytic evidence supports the reliability and validity of this scale (Bowling & Hammond, 2008 ).”
Building better measures of role ambiguity and role conflict: The validation of new role stressor scales (2017, methodology): “Meta-analytic evidence provides support for the reliability and validity of this measure (Bowling & Hammond, 2008).”
Work engagement, psychological contract breach and job satisfaction (2014, methodology): “We measure job satisfaction in the first wave of our survey using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire, a three-item measure of overall job satisfaction (Cammann, Fichman, Jenkins and Klesh 1983), which has been meta-analyzed and found to have acceptable reliability across the multit”
Unlocking the black box: exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. (2011, methodology): “Job satisfaction was measured with three items derived from existing studies (Bowling & Hammond, 2008; my ability to do my job, " (e) " I am self-assured about my capabilities to perform my work activities, " and (f) " I have mastered the skills necessary for my job.”
A Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction (2012, background): “A further two brief measures meeting some of the seven selection criteria are derived primarily from Brayfield and Rothe’s (1951) 18-item Index of Job Satisfaction (IJS).”
The role of family support in work-family balance and subjective well-being of SME owners (2020, neutral): “Previous studies have demonstrated that MOAQ-JSS is a reliable and valid measure of job satisfaction (Bowling & Hammond, 2008).”
Effects of attitudes vs experience of workplace fun on employee behaviors: Focused on Generation Y in the hospitality industry (2013, background): “The MOAQ is described as a face-valid measure of the affective component of job satisfaction in that the items include either the word “satisfied” or “like” (Bowling and Hammond, 2008).”
Workplace Well-Being: The Role of Job Crafting and Autonomy Support (2015, methodology): “Studies have supported the validity of the scale (e.g., Bowling and Hammond 2008).”