A Social–Cognitive Approach to the Moral Personality

By D. Lapsley, D. Narvaez. 2004

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/635834fde5e504796765584d5cbd2b85aaa3ab3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Identity, Reasoning, and Emotion: An Empirical Comparison of Three Sources of Moral Motivation (2006, background): “This reminds us that morality is not unidimensional, but should be viewed within a more holistic personality perspective (Colby & Damon, 1992; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Walker & Hennig, 1997).”
Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why Does It Matter? An Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership (2012, background): “…of ethical leadership by testing whether one source of motivation for leaders to exhibit ethical behaviors arises from a self-defining knowledge structure that several writers (e.g., Aquino & Reed, 2002; Blasi, 1983, 2004; Damon & Hart, 1992; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004) refer to as moral identity.”
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review (2006, background): “…on May 11, 2016jom.sagepub.comDownloaded from Early empirical research on the relationship of moral identity to moral motivation and behavior primarily was qualitative (e.g., Colby & Damon, 1992; Oliner & Oliner, 1988) or developmentally focused (see Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Lapsley & Power, 2005).”
Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. (2009, background): “…through life experiences that vary across persons, the importance or centrality of this moral self-schema to one’s overall self-conception also differs across individuals (Aquino & Reed, 2002; Blasi, 1980, 2004; Lapsley, 1996; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Narvaez, Lapsley, Hagele, & Lasky, 2006).”
Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate (2007, background): “…or behavior is coded as morally relevant seems to depend on individuals’ idiosyncratic mapping of the moral domain, their tendency to see the world in moral terms (Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004), and the importance they attribute to preserving or enhancing a moral self-image (Aquino & Reed, 2002).”
A Model of Third Parties' Morally Motivated Responses to Mistreatment in Organizations (2011, background): “According to the social cognitive view of moral identity, people can vary in the degree to which their moral identity can be both chronically and temporally activated (Aquino, et al., 2009; Aquino & Reed, 2002; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Shao et al., 2008).”
Through two lenses: A cultural–developmental approach to moral psychology (2008, background): “…with recent identity work on moral reasoning and behavior that also emphasizes a certain measure of cognitive coherence within the self (e.g., Blasi, 1994; Colby & Damon, 1992; Damon, Menon, & Bronk, 2003; Lapsley, 2006; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Yates & Youniss, 1996; Youniss & Yates, 1997).”
Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique (2019, background): “The notions of integrity, personal responsibility, and identity as the origin of moral motivation (Blasi 1995; Hardy and Carlo 2005; Lapsley and Narvaez 2004) do not apply within Turiel’s social-interactionist model.”
Being “in Control” May Make You Lose Control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior (2013, background): “Moral identity is usually conceptualized as a cognitive representation or schema of moral values, goals, traits, and behavioral scripts (Aquino et al. 2009; Lapsley and Narvaez 2004; Shao et al. 2008).”
Identity as a Source of Moral Motivation (2005, background): “Blasi’s insightful and intriguing ideas regarding identity and morality have inspired interest in moral identity, and are beginning to spur empirical investigation into this facet of morality [Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004a].”
The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. (2009, background): “Moral chronicity (Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Narvaez, Lapsley, Hagele, & Lasky, 2006) refers to the extent to which one codes the world in moral terms, or how schematic (Markus, 1977) one is about morality.”
A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act (2007, background): “2004; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Narvaez & Lapsley, 2005) influence an individual’s behaviour in social situations concerning moral matters.”
Status Differentiation and the Protean Self: A Social-Cognitive Model of Unethical Behavior in Organizations (2011, background): “…prototype’’ is also associated with certain behavioral standards of social responsiveness, justice, and personal agency (Lapsley and Lasky, 2001; Lapsley and Narvaez, 2004), the salience of a person’s moral identity should be related to engagement in behaviors that can affect others’…”