What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses

By John Dunlosky, Katherine A. Rawson, E. Middleton. 2005

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e9b4dda1d514d4c96009e21d2285fee36477f54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials (2007, methodology): “For this purpose, we adapted the method used by Dunlosky et al. (2005) described above.”
Metacomprehension A Brief History and How to Improve Its Accuracy (2007, background): “These results are presented in the left panel of Figure 1, where the mean judgment is plotted as a function of the outcome of prejudgment recall (Dunlosky et al., 2005, Experiment 2).”
Metacognitive Monitoring During and After Reading (2009, background): “Dunlosky, Rawson, and Middleton (2005) tested the possibility that a mismatch in grain”
Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration (2013, methodology): “SSJs require learners to provide an estimate regarding the quality of their response (i.e., their recall, Dunlosky et al., 2005).”
A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring (2009, background): “The “Recommendations for practice” section considers several unresolved issues that affect the inferences drawn from monitoring research studies, including the relationship between each of the measures ( Dunlosky et al. 2005; Veenman et al. 2006).”
Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards (2010, unknown): “Calibration is usually assessed by comparing students’ judgements about their perceived capability to succeed in completing a task or set of items (e.g., Dunlosky et al. 2005 ), that is, their prediction about their performance, with their achieved score (e.g., Chen 2002; Pajares and Graham 1999; P”
Effective Implementation of Metacognition (2009, background): “Participants in a study by Dunlosky, Rawson, and Middleton (2005) also made”
Handbook of Metamemory and Memory (2013, unknown): “How they do this has been the subject of intensive research (Blake, 1973; Butterfield, Nelson, & Peck, 1988; Costermans, Lories, & Ansay, 1992; Dunlosky, Rawson, & Middleton, 2005; Hertzog & Dixon, 1994; Koriat, 1993; Schneider, Visé, Lockl, & Nelson, 2000; Sikström & Jönsson, 2005).”