Metacognitive Monitoring During and After Reading
By Keith Thiede, Thomas D. Griffin, Jennifer Wiley, Joshua S. Redford. 2009
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34aee0a3fab12ec29e953499aedf464b6a620d6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jennifer Wiley
- John Dunlosky
- Keith Thiede
- Thomas D. Griffin
- Robert A. Bjork
- Joshua S. Redford
- Nate Kornell
- Mary C. M. Anderson
Citations in the corpus
- Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use (2010, background): “The order of cue quality was based on theoretical premises that metacomprehension cues that assess the quality of understanding of the situation-model level representation will be the most valid predictors of performance on a test of comprehension (Griffin, Jee, & Wiley, 2009; Thiede et al., 2009; W”
- Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders (2012, background): “Recent interventions that improve metacomprehension accuracy have done just this (for a review of this research see Thiede et al., 2009).”
- Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. (2013, background): “(For starters, see Dunlosky & Lipko 2007, Thiede et al. 2009.)”