How Can Theories of Organizational Justice Explain the Effects of Fairness
By Steven L. Blader, Tom Tyler. 2005
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59dd6157ae45a2dd25ecb2a46e166cb9ae9d2e5d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Jordan H. Stein
- Chad T. Brinsfield
- Ali Al-Kahtani
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Russell E. Johnson
- Jennifer L. Sparr
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Rex D. Foster
In Sociology and Political Science
- Russell E. Johnson
- J. Bosson
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Chad T. Brinsfield
- Ali Al-Kahtani
- Tessa Melkonian
- Jinyun Duan
- Niels Noorderhaven
In Strategy and Management
- Ali Al-Kahtani
- Chad T. Brinsfield
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Russell E. Johnson
- Niels Noorderhaven
- Jordan H. Stein
- Jennifer L. Sparr
- Russell S. Cropanzano
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects (2009, background): “Hafer and Olson argue that people sometimes believe it is appropriate to distinguish how they treat others (cf. Blader & Tyler, 2001).”
- Identity Negotiation at Work (2009, background): “A breakdown in identity negotiations at any of these levels would contribute to perceptions of unfairness (Ambrose & Arnaud, 2005; Blader & Tyler, 2005).”
- Authoritarian leadership and employee silence in China (2017, background): “This may lead to the employee feeling valued and respected, which may increase their self-esteem (see Blader & Tyler, 2005).”
- Distributive justice, procedural justice, exemplarity, and employees’ willingness to cooperate in M&A integration processes : An analysis of the Air France-KLM merger (2011, background): “Three decades of research (Colquitt, Greenberg, & Zapata-Phelan, 2005) have offered convincing evidence that justice perceptions substantially impact employees’ cooperative attitudes and behaviors at work, notably in the context of organizational change (Blader & Tyler, 2005).”
- Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work (2008, methodology): “If the employee did not reciprocate, this would set the exchange relationship at risk (Blader & Tyler, 2005).”
- Resistance, justice, and commitment to change (2010, background): “However, reviews of procedural justice research suggest that justice influences employee reactions even if outcomes are negative (Brockner et al., 1994; Brockner & Wiesenfeld, 1996). For example, Brockner et al. (1994) found that regardless of the outcome of a particular organizational decision, fai”
- Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, unknown): “This argument has its roots in relational models of procedural justice (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992), one of several theoretical approaches that address why people react to procedural justice (Blader & Tyler, 2005).”
- Investigating Factors that Influence Employees' Turnover Intention: A Review of Existing Empirical Works (2015, background): “…proven to be strongly associated with many dynamics related to change, such as openness to change, acceptance of change, cooperation with change, satisfaction with change (Blader & Tyler, 2005; Tyler & Blader, 2003; Wanberg & Banas, 2000) and individual response to change (Greenberg, 2001).”