Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

525 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis (2020, background): “…others, the sole focus is on technology-mediated peer assessment (Chen 2016); and in others, only higher education settings (e.g. Topping 1998; van Gennip, Segers, and Tillema 2009; van Zundert, Sluijsmans, and van Merrienboer 2010) or K-12 (e.g. Hodgson 2010; Sanchez et al. 2017) are considered.”
The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2018, methodology): “The data was analysed using the ‘metafor’ package (version 2.0- 0, Viechtbauer 2010; see also Polanin, Hennessy and Tanner-Smith 2017) in R (version 3.4.2, R Core team 2017).”
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Although research examining these variables in association with motor skill learning is progressing, at the present time it is not yet possible to draw conclusions about the association between these variables and motor skill development.”
Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective (2010, background): “When task performance is conducted more interactively, discursive processes such as explaining (Webb, 1989), arguing (Andriessen, Baker, & Suthers, 2003) or questioning (King, 1997) may facilitate high-level cognitive processing.”