Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge

By A. Carroll. 2004

521 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56093c9aa156cc668d5da2d7fc3c27e6cb7c213a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction (2015, unknown): “, 2003; Rettab, Brik, & Mellahi, 2009; Shen & Chang, 2008; Van Beurden & Gössling, 2008). For example, empirical findings by some (e.g. Alafi & Hasoneh, 2012; Galbreath & Shum, 2012; Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006; Margolis et al., 2008; Shen & Chang, 2008) researchers showed a positive association betwee”
Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR–FP link? Evidence from Australia (2012, methodology): “…can engage in socially responsible practices such as ethical treatment of customers (Carroll, 2004; Taylor, 2003), employee training (which has downstream implications for equitable treatment of customers) (Maignan et al., 1999), or through improvements in product quality (Carroll, 1979, 2004).”
Revisiting Carroll's CSR Pyramid: An African Perspective (2005, background): “corporate citizenship (Carroll, 1998) and stakeholders (Carroll, 2004); 4.”
Is Doing Good Good for You? How Corporate Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth (2009, unknown): “Corporate philanthropy is one such component (Carroll, 2004), albeit an important, highly visible component with specific attributes that make it particularly amenable to empirical research.”
Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (2009, methodology): “Compared to other conceptualization of CSR, Carroll’s framework is broad enough to consider other concepts of CSR including corporate citizenship (Carroll, 1998) and stakeholder theory (Carroll, 2004).”
On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work (2019, background): “The CSR literature has been criticized for not being internationally diverse (Carroll, 2004; Cui, Liang, & Lu, 2015).”
Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility (2015, background): “A company’s CSR efforts communicate to stakeholders that the company is willing to engage in activities that go beyond what is generally expected of corporate actors, legally or even in an ethical sense (Carroll, 2004), to contribute to the welfare of society.”
A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Endorsement of Ethical Leadership (2006, background): “The increasingly multinational nature of business creates a need for research aimed at understanding global business ethics (Carroll, 2004), and this is particularly true regarding ethical leadership.”
Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern (2009, unknown): “, Carroll, A.B. and Buchholtz, A.K. (2003) ‘Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity Begins at Home’, Business and Society, 42: 169-201. Schrage, E. (2003) ‘Emerging Threat: Human Rights Claims’, Harvard Business Review, 81(8): 1618. Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001) ‘Does Doing Good Alw”