Dimensions Affecting the Assessment of Reading Comprehension
By D. Francis, Jack M. Fletcher, H. Catts, J. Tomblin. 2005
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50449d4a8aae88bfa69c10a4724a4475c5446750
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Y. Kim
- R. Silverman
- Jeffrey R. Harring
- H. Catts
- R. Olson
- Rebecca S. Betjemann
- J. Keenan
- Suzanne M. Adlof
In Education
- Y. Kim
- C. Patrick Proctor
- Laurie E. Cutting
- R. Olson
- Jeffrey R. Harring
- J. Keenan
- R. Silverman
- H. Scarborough
Citations in the corpus
- Language deficits in poor comprehenders: a case for the simple view of reading. (2006, background): “changing nature of reading comprehension (Francis et al., 2005; Gough et al., 1996).”
- Examining the role of vocabulary depth, cross-linguistic transfer, and types of reading measures on the reading comprehension of Latino bilinguals in elementary school (2013, background): “Francis et al. (2006) hypothesized that the WJLPB-R PC is heavily affected by print related skills and tested whether the DARC and WJLB-R PC are two distinct measures of reading comprehension.”
- Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension (2008, background): “In addition, because there is the suggestion from Nation and Snowling (1997) and Francis et al. (2005) that tests using a cloze format may be more influenced by decoding skill than other comprehension tests, it is important to examine additional tests to try to provide further insight into this…”
- Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). (2019, result): “…as a function of text characteristics is in line with work on measurement of comprehension (Cutting & Scarborough, 2006; Francis, Fletcher, Catts, & Tomblin, 2005; Keenan, Betjemann, & Olson, 2008) and with recent recognition of text characteristics in reading comprehension (Francis et al., 2018).”
- Prediction of Reading Comprehension: Relative Contributions of Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, and Other Cognitive Skills Can Depend on How Comprehension Is Measured (2006, background): “Similarly, Francis et al. (2005) found, using latent variable modeling techniques, a stronger relationship between decoding and a cloze test than for comprehension measures that used silent or oral passage reading with multiple-choice questions (both of which had a stronger relationship with…”