A Clash of Social Class Cultures? Students' Experiences in a Discussion-Intensive Seventh-Grade Mathematics Classroom
By S. Lubienski. The Elementary school journal, 2000
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d038e61f94a2c2dec4b5c79187473b2d227f096
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- J. Woodward
- Susan B. Empson
- Michelle Perry
- Linda M. Sims
- Meg Schleppenbach
- Lucia M. Flevares
- J. Baxter
- S. McMahon
Citations in the corpus
- Low-Performing Students and Teaching Fractions for Understanding: An Interactional Analysis (2003, background): “Similarly, in a study of students’ participation in a reformoriented seventh-grade mathematics classroom, Lubienski (2000) reported that students from poor and working class families (i.e., low-SES students) felt less confident about their contributions to mathematical discussions than students fr”
- Research, Reform, and Equity in U.S. Mathematics Education (2002, background): “Again, see Lubienski (2000a) for more information.”
- We Talk about It, but Do They Get It? (2002, background): “Seminal discourse work in the past (e.g., Gee, 1996; Heath, 1983; Walkerdine, 1988), as well as recent mathematics research (Lubienski, 2000), documents the linguistic conflicts between the middle-class expectations of schools and the sociocultural backgrounds of working-class students.”
- The Relation of Classroom Environment and School Belonging to Academic Self-Efficacy among Urban Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students (2009, background): “Conversely, math and science curricula JANUARY 2009 are often taught through direct instruction in which the teacher presents information to students, who are receptive rather than interactive learners (Lubienski, 2000).”
- Teachers’ Responses to Student Mistakes in Chinese and U.S. Mathematics Classrooms (2007, methodology): “After we placed all the statements in a single database, we coded each for themes regarding teachers’ beliefs and ideas about errors (e.g., Lubienski, 2000a, 2000b).”