We Talk about It, but Do They Get It?

By J. Baxter, J. Woodward, Jill Voorhies, Jennifer Wong. 2002

66 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4df4c28e15578c7d33c4a3078222870210813e54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Brown
2. J. Woodward
3. D. Olson
4. Marja Vauras
5. J. Baxter
6. A. Kajamies
7. Riitta Kinnunen
8. Asha K. Jitendra

In Statistics and Probability

1. C. Brown
2. J. Woodward
3. J. Baxter
4. A. Kajamies
5. Marja Vauras
6. Riitta Kinnunen
7. Asha K. Jitendra

Citations in the corpus

• Meeting the Curricular Needs of Academically Low-Achieving Students in Middle Grade Mathematics (2006, methodology): “The scale, which has been used in previous research on low-achieving and special education students (e.g., Baxter et al., 2002), helped us to determine the comparability of the intervention and the comparison classrooms.”
• Instructing Low‐Achievers in Mathematical Word Problem Solving (2010, background): “It showed that more realistic mathematical modeling can be developed in elementary school students, but the improvement was more marked in the high‐achievers (Verschaffel & De Corte, 1997a ; see also Baxter, Woodward, Voorhies, & Wong, 2002 ).”
• Writing in Mathematics: An Alternative Form of Communication for Academically Low–Achieving Students (2005, methodology): “We then developed strategies for her to respond more quickly and efficiently to the journals (see Baxter et al., 2002a), but the journals clearly added to the teacher’s daily workload.”