Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and nonwork domains
By R. Ilies, Kelly M Schwind, D. Heller. 2007
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/499cb1b93cb01372a515d582d4ab9fd1856960dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Helen Pluut
- S. Aw
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Kelly Schwind Wilson
In General Health Professions
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Toon W. Taris
- M. van Veldhoven
- Hans De Witte
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Toon W. Taris
- Daantje Derks
- Ulla Kinnunen *
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within-individual variability using a complexity science approach (2011, background): “…(Ilies, Johnson, Judge, & Keeney, 2010), skill variety and autonomy (Fullagar & Kelloway, 2009), spillover effects across work and non-work domains (Ilies et al., 2007; Sonnentag, 2003), and the impact of positive and negative events on employee well-being (Beal & Ghandour, 2010; Dimotakis, Scott,…”
- What is Psychological Well-Being, Really? A Grassroots Approach from the Organizational Sciences (2012, background): “This lends some value to efforts at testing PWB interrelations across life domains, a topic that has begun to be explored empirically using longitudinal designs (e.g. Ilies et al. 2007 ).”
- Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? (2015, methodology): “Also, applying AET outside of the work domain, one study found that workload and affect at work had a spillover effect on employees’ experience of work–family conflict and affect, which in turn influenced employees’ engagement in social behaviours at home (Ilies et al., 2007).”
- Everyday working life: Explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being (2012, background): “Even though it has been studied traditionally as a trait (see Ilies et al., 2007), a recent stream of research has conceptualized and measured job satisfaction as a time-varying state and attempted to examine its antecedents and outcomes in experience-sampling studies.”
- Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect (2008, background): “Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect Sabine Sonnentag*, Eva J. Mojza, Carmen Binnewies and Annika Scholl”
- THE SPILLOVER OF DAILY JOB SATISFACTION ONTO EMPLOYEES' FAMILY LIVES: THE FACILITATING ROLE OF WORK-FAMILY INTEGRATION (2009, background): “…spousal reports of employees’ affect were significantly correlated with self-reports that we collected for the broader work-family research project (Ilies et al., 2007) for both positive affect (r .24, p .001) and negative affect (r .34, p .001), which supports the validity of the spousal reports…”
- Emotional labour in service work: Psychological flexibility and emotion regulation (2012, background): “the day level) contributes to our understanding of work experiences as they unfold in the course of a working week (Ilies et al., 2007).”