The Impact of Anticipated Social Consequences on Recurring Disability Accommodation Requests

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda (2018, background): “For example, Baldridge and Veiga (2006) investigated how persons with hearing dis- abilities decide to request accommodations based on their assessment of the likelihood of compliance, normative beliefs, and anticipated psy- chosocial consequences, with greater monetary costs and impositions on…”
Maladaptive Personality at Work: Exploring the Darkness (2014, background): “Conceptual models of the likelihood of requesting and being granted accommodations under ADA exist and we refer readers to these sources for further discussion (e.g., Baldridge & Veiga, 2001, 2006, Florey & Harrison, 2000).”
Mental Illness in the Workplace: An Interdisciplinary Review and Organizational Research Agenda (2018, background): “In addition to knowledge, these additional factors should be explored regarding mental illness accommodation requests (Baldridge & Veiga, 2006).”
Disability in the Workplace (2016, background): “…highlights concern about social stigma at an interpersonal level as one of the strongest interpersonal predictors of how workers with visible (Baldridge & Veiga, 2006; Hebl & Kleck, 2000, 2002) or concealable (Beatty & Kirby, 2006; Earnshaw & Quinn, 2012; Quinn & Earnshaw, 2011) disabilities…”