Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications

By Jeffrey B. Vancouver, D. Day. 2005

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45b7d7c5065ea6565b0c1456c84f97122d57816e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The nomological network of self-management strategies and career success (2008, background): “Not surprisingly, therefore, there is a growing interest in conceptualizing individual career management from a self-regulatory perspective (e.g., King, 2004; Kossek, Roberts, Fisher, & Demarr, 1998; Vancouver & Day, 2005).”
The Role of Self-Reflection, Emotional Management of Feedback, and Self-Regulation Processes in Self-Directed Leadership Development (2012, unknown): “Although there is a growing research literature on self-regulation in the industrial and organizational domain (Vancouver & Day, 2005) and a lengthy research attention to self-directed learning and experiential learning in the adult education field (Ellinger, 2004), application of such research…”
Things to do today...: a daily diary study on task completion at work (2010, background): “Four types of process may be distinguished in self-regulation ( Vancouver & Day, 2005 ): goal establishment (adopting, adapting, or rejecting a goal); planning (preparing to pursue a goal); striving (moving toward or maintaining a goal); and revision (possible change or disengagement from a goal).”
The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions (2016, background): “…an upcoming assessment because they falsely believe their work is good enough (through some failure of meta-memory) or who decide not to pursue a career option because they consider they are deficient in that domain (Vancouver & Day, 2005) are using “inaccurate” SSA to make educational decisions.”
Within-Person Variability in Job Performance (2014, background): “…reactions to work situations are by no means solely within-person phenomena (e.g., Watson & Clark, 1999), and cognitive reactions to job characteristics are by no means solely between-person phenomena (e.g., Vancouver & Day, 2005; see also the subsequent discussion of broaden-and-build theory).”
Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014, background): “However, procrastination can also be caused by exaggerated optimism (Vancouver & Day, 2005), warranting cognitive restructuring and behavioral experiments that target cognitions resulting in ineffective time management and difficulties related to self-control (Vancouver, More, & Yoder, 2008) (e.g.,…”
Perseverance Strategies for Enterprising Individuals (2012, background): “Carver and Scheier’s control theory One set of self-regulation theories, control theory (Carver and Scheier, 1981, 1998), is particularly concerned with goal striving and revision processes, as opposed to establishment and planning processes (Vancouver and Day, 2005).”
Experienced teachers’ informal learning from classroom teaching (2007, methodology): “For the names of subcategories of deliberative activities we drew upon notions from literature regarding self‐regulated learning; these were orienting (Vermunt & Verloop, 1999 ) and seeking feedback (see Vancouver & Day, 2005 ) and from the literature on teachers’ learning activities: experim”
Self-regulation and moral awareness among entrepreneurs (2009, background): “In the face of such complexity, self-efficacious persons will tend to evaluate and adjust ends and means in relation to moral considerations (Bandura, 1997; Vancouver and Day, 2005).”
A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations (2012, background): “During this continual, cyclical feedback process, individuals constantly plan and strive for their goals (Lord et al., 2010; Vancouver & Day, 2005).”