All Work and No Play? A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Correlates and Outcomes of Workaholism

By Malissa A. Clark, Jesse S. Michel, L. Zhdanova, S. Pui, B. Baltes. 2016

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/434efaebdd7b2c0b92e585c90d4428e964826150

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. A. Hirschi
2. Daniel Spurk
3. Cristian Balducci
4. Anita C. Keller
5. L. Avanzi
6. F. Fraccaroli

In Social Psychology

1. Anita C. Keller
2. A. Hirschi
3. Daniel Spurk
4. L. Avanzi
5. Cristian Balducci
6. F. Baumeler
7. F. Fraccaroli
8. Anne Herrmann

Citations in the corpus

• Workaholism and work engagement: how are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019, unknown): “…and work engagement has been found in some cases (e.g., Hakanen et al., 2012; Schaufeli et al., 2009), while others have reported a null or nonsignificant association (e.g., Clark et al., 2016; Schaufeli et al., 2008; Simbula & Guglielmi, 2013; van Wijhe, Peeters, Schaufeli, & van Den Hout, 2011).”
• Competitive climate and workaholism: Negative sides of future orientation and calling (2016, background): “In competitive climates, employees may perform at high levels but still not succeed in terms of organizational rewards (i.e., salary and managerial status) (Clark et al., 2014).”
• The Individual “Costs” of Workaholism: An Analysis Based on Multisource and Prospective Data (2018, background): “The present study fills a number of gaps in the literature on workaholism as summarized by a recent meta-analysis on the topic (Clark et al., 2014).”