The Lack of Consensus About Strategic Consensus: Advancing Theory and Research
By Franz Willi Kellermanns, Jorge Walter, Christoph Lechner, Steven W. Floyd. 2005
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4226134195849b69b145d8be435ee1b8994ad88d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- M. Maynard
- Tammy L. Rapp
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Lucy L. Gilson
- D. Carrington
- Jorge Walter
- Steven W. Floyd
- D. van Knippenberg
In Social Psychology
- John E. Mathieu
- M. Maynard
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Tammy L. Rapp
- D. van Knippenberg
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- D. Carrington
- John F. Veiga
In Strategy and Management
- Nüfer Yasin Ates
- Patrick J. F. Groenen
- Murat Tarakci
- J. Porck
- Lucy L. Gilson
- M. Maynard
- D. Carrington
- Jorge Walter
Citations in the corpus
- Strategic alignment: A missing link in the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance (2013, background): “challenging one another’s beliefs and ideas but maintaining trust and respect (Kellermanns et al., 2005; Menon and Bharadwaj, 1996)—may be one way to create consensus around a well-aligned strategy.”
- Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “Empirically, Kirkman et al. (2004) demonstrated that the extent to which teams met face to face moderated the relationship between team empowerment and performance (i.”
- Testing and Visualizing Strategic Consensus Within and Between Teams (2011, methodology): “Furthermore, it is important to see to what extent different organizational units agree on strategic priorities, because a strong alignment between groups is needed to achieve organizational objectives in addition to within-group strategic consensus (Kellermanns et al., 2005).”
- Rethinking ‘Top-Down’ and ‘Bottom-Up’ Roles of Top and Middle Managers in Organizational Change: Implications for Employee Support (2017, unknown): “Employees perceive TMdriven change initiation as coercive, imposed and autocratic (J.D. Ford, Ford, and D'Amelio, 2008) or even unfair (Kellermanns et al., 2005), accentuating their feelings of powerlessness (Ashforth, 1989).”
- The Dark Side of Visionary Leadership in Strategy Implementation: Strategic Alignment, Strategic Consensus, and Commitment (2018, methodology): “That said, the evidence would suggest that on balance, strategic consensus is desirable for strategy implementation across the board (cf. Kellermanns et al., 2005; Markoczy, 2001).”
- Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals (2012, background): “Five studies have found empirical support for environmental factors as moderators (also see the strategic consensus literature; e.g., Kellermanns et al., 2005).”
- To Agree or Not to Agree? A Meta-Analytical Review of Strategic Consensus and Organizational Performance (2011, unknown): “Extending the few theoretical reviews of the literature on strategic consensus (Dess and Priem, 1995; Kellermanns et al., 2005; Priem, 1990),we empirically test the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance by performing a meta-analysis across all of the available empir”
- The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of Tmt Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency (2010, unknown): “This should then be positively associated with organizational performance (Kellermanns et al., 2005).”
- Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, unknown): “Psychological ownership can be observed across all organizational levels (Floyd and Wooldridge, 1997; Kellermanns et al., 2005) or even as a collective phenomenon (Pierce and Jussila, 2010).”
- Leaders' sensemaking under crises: Emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams (2015, background): “In the decision making literature consensus and its implications for performance have been studied considerably but with inconclusive results (see Kellermanns et al., 2005, for a review).”