The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of Tmt Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency

By Yan Ling, Franz Willi Kellermanns. 2010

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b745de0fc70e0648d0f6e1fbe8d2d84bfb168db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, unknown): “These correlations are of similar strength compared to other studies that investigate subjective and objective performance measures of privately held companies (e.g. Ling and Kellermanns, 2010).”
Getting Everyone on Board (2015, methodology): “Indeed, subjective measurement of firm performance has been used extensively in TMT studies (e.g., Chen et al., 2005; Ling & Kellermanns, 2010; Lubatkin et al., 2006), and prior research has demonstrated substantial overlap between subjective performance measures and their objective counterparts…”
Firm Philanthropy in Small- and Medium-Sized Family Firms (2014, unknown): “These items were constructed based on the questionnaire proposed by Litz and Stewart (2000). Respondents had to select the degree of commitment for each item on a 5-point Likerttype scale.”
Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with resource availability on SME performance (2020, background): “Prior research has found strong empirical support of the high correlations among objective and subjective measures (Ling and Kellermanns 2010) which allows considering the latter as a reliable indicator of firm performance.”
Planning for Growth: Life Stage Differences in Family Firms (2013, unknown): “…to strategic planning and growth, a generational perspective highlights the differences among first-, second-, and third-and-beyond-generation family firms (e.g., Bammens, Voordeckers, & Van Gils, 2008; Cruz & Nordqvist, 2012; Gersick et al., 1997; Lubatkin et al., 2005; Sonfield & Lussier, 2004).”
Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter (2016, background): “Existing research attempted to directly link family generation in control to measures of entrepreneurial outcomes, such as entrepreneurial orientation (e.g., Cruz & Nordqvist, 2012), growth (e.g., Casillas et al., 2010), or performance (Ling & Kellermanns, 2010).”