Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals
By George A. Shinkle. 2012
380 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/391f3df0d5ff630c649948e11c95ab37bc4a16e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Stavroula Spyropoulou
- Anna Kaleka
- Dionysis Skarmeas
- Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk
- Chanan Ben-Oz
- Constantine S. Katsikeas
- Thomas P. Moliterno
- Yan Zhang
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Robert S. Nason
- Sophie Bacq
- David Gras
- Constantine S. Katsikeas
- Anna Kaleka
- Stavroula Spyropoulou
- Dionysis Skarmeas
- Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk
In Safety Research
- Chanan Ben-Oz
- Robert S. Nason
- Anna Kaleka
- Dionysis Skarmeas
- Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk
- Constantine S. Katsikeas
- Thomas P. Moliterno
- Yan Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Short- and Long-Term Performance Feedback and Absorptive Capacity (2015, background): “In addition, investigation of moderators of the performance feedback relations has been noted as a high priority task in research, with environmental dynamism especially promising because it may affect learning processes (Shinkle, 2012).”
- Back to basics: Behavioral theory and internationalization (2020, background): “Such an internationalization motive would be consistent with the evidence on how performance below aspiration levels in financial goals such as return on investment (ROA) can lead to a broad range of strategic actions (Greve & Gaba, 2017; Shinkle, 2012).”
- How marketing capabilities and current performance drive strategic intentions in international markets (2017, background): “Aspiration levels are the result of the adoption of different referents, such as historical performance, other firms' performance, and level of perceived opportunity (Greve, 1998; Park, 2007; Shinkle, 2012).”
- Disentangling Risk and Change (2015, methodology): “In table 1, we distinguish between organizational change and risk as the central outcomes examined in this feedback/adaptation process, also known as performance feedback theory, using examples from selected studies (for a comprehensive review, see Shinkle, 2012).”
- Relative Strategic Emphasis and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk: The Moderating Role of Relative Performance and Demand Instability (2017, positive): “Another key contribution of this research is to supplement prior research that has basically examined relative performance as a direct antecedent of risk taking by managers (Fiegenbaum and Thomas 1986; March and Shapira 1992; Shinkle 2012).”
- Strategic goal accomplishment in export ventures: the role of capabilities, knowledge, and environment (2018, background): “In organization theory and practice, goals are hierarchical in nature (e.g., Greve 2008; Shinkle 2012).”
- A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, methodology): “…of the firm grounded in financial performance, reference points tend to be either selected by the firm or imposed on the firm by external forces (Shinkle, 2012).1 In contrast, we propose that firms have agency in the degree to which theyadopt, rebuff, or shapemoremalleable social performance…”