Developing criteria for healthy organizational change

By P. O. Saksvik, Sturle Danielsen Tvedt, K. Nytrø, Gunn Robstad Andersen, T. Andersen, Marte Pettersen Buvik, H. Torvatn. 2007

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40a225503d16b7f020466097b57a66697e5a3118

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Citations in the corpus

Adapting to change: The value of change information and meaning-making (2013, unknown): “(Bartunek, Krim, Necochea & Humphries, 1999; Saksvik et al., 2007).”
Causes of stress before, during and after organizational change: a qualitative study (2015, background): “Through interviewing 180 managers and staff on change in the public and private sectors, individually or in groups, Saksvik et al. (2007) identified five categories of strain: awareness of organizational norms, understanding of diverse perceptions, early role clarification, managerial availability…”
Personal Resources and Work Engagement in the Face of Change (2010, background): “Change has become a constant and may form a risk factor for employee health and well-being (Saksvik et al., 2007).”
Autopsy of a failure, evaluating process and contextual issues in an organizational-level work stress intervention (2010, unknown): “(2008) categorized the existing issues in the stress literature (Brun, Biron, & Ivers, 2008; Giga, Faragher, & Cooper, 2003; Nytrø, Saksvik, Mikkelsen, Bohle, & Quinlan, 2000; Saksvik, Nytrø, DahlJorgensen, & Mikkelsen, 2002; Saksvik et al., 2007), existing models in occupational health and safety (”
Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. (2014, methodology): “* Based on the risk management approach by Cox et al. (2001), and on process and context evaluation studies and models by Biron et al. 2009, Goldenhar et al. 2001, Nielsen and Randall 2012, Saksvik et al. 2002, Saksvik et al. 2007.”
Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: Beyond traditional methods (2007, background): “The point for consideration here is that while outcome evaluation can establish the fact of an effect (or otherwise), alone it does not offer an explanation of how that effect happened or did not happen or happened only in part (Griffiths, 1999 ; Landsbergis & Vivona-Vaughan, 1995 ; Nielsen, Freds”