Time Pressure and Performance of Scientists and Engineers; A Five-Year Panel Study
By F. M. Andrews, George F. Farris. 2015
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e63b7dc0d528866360f5bd6b5c284ec2b499030
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Chia-huei Wu
- Sharon K. Parker
- Marianne W. Lewis
- Ella Miron-Spektor
- Likoebe Mohau Maruping
- Brent D. Rosso
- Joshua Keller
- V. Venkatesh
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
In Strategy and Management
- Wendy K. Smith
- Ella Miron-Spektor
- Joshua Keller
- Sharon K. Parker
- A. Ingram
- Sherry M. B. Thatcher
- Brent D. Rosso
- V. Venkatesh
Citations in the corpus
- Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams (2014, background): “Andrews and Farris (1972) found positive, significant relations between scientists’ experienced time pressure and their creativity.”
- Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing (2017, background): “…results and a full range of possible time pressure effects, including negative (Andrews and Smith, 1996; Antes and Mumford, 2009), positive (Andrews and Farris, 1972; Ekvall and Ryhammar, 1999; Ohly and Fritz, 2010), nonlinear (Baer and Oldham, 2006; Ohly et al., 2006), and non-significant…”
- Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity (2013, background): “For example, a number of studies have reported a positive relationship between the challenge stressor of time pressure and creativity (e.g. Andrews & Farris, 1972; Ohly & Fritz, 2010), while others have found a negative effect of time pressure on creative cognitive processing (Amabile et al., 2002).”
- Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem (2017, background): “Similarly, Andrews and Farris (1972) found that increased time pressure improved the performance of NASA scientists and engineers.”
- Folding Under Pressure or Rising to the Occasion? Perceived Time Pressure and the Moderating Role of Team Temporal Leadership (2014, background): “Some studies have found that time pressure has a positive effect on performance (e.g., Amabile, Conti, Coon, Lazenby, & Herron, 1996; Andrews & Farris, 1972; Pearsall et al., 2009).”
- Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior (2014, background): “In another study, Axsom, Chaiken, and Yates (1987) found that people high in need for cognition generated a similar and higher number of thoughts than those low in need for cognition, regardless of the level of situational involvement.”