Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams

By Brent D. Rosso. 2014

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60e33e911a2e9a85e7fa4ce5e983b57a32fb7331

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. N. Thompson
2. Yan Shao
3. B. Nijstad
4. Susanne Täuber
5. Eric Rietzschel
6. Wolfgang Stroebe
7. V. Glăveanu
8. Carsten K. W. De Dreu

In Social Psychology

1. N. Thompson
2. Yan Shao
3. B. Nijstad
4. Susanne Täuber
5. Eric Rietzschel
6. Wolfgang Stroebe
7. Paul B. Paulus
8. Carsten K. W. De Dreu

In Strategy and Management

1. N. Thompson
2. Yan Shao
3. B. Nijstad
4. Susanne Täuber

Citations in the corpus

• Imagination and Creativity in Organizations (2018, background): “…(2003) dynamic perspective, Sonenshein argues that shared routines necessarily involve creativity because diverse actors regularly exercise creative agency as they move between revising abstract patterns of routines and devising new ways to engage with changing situations (see also Rosso, 2014).”
• Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership (2019, background): “Instead of assuming that autonomy/freedom is good and control/constraint is bad for creativity, recent research showed that autonomy/freedom and control/constraint have inconsistent, paradoxical relationships with creativity, showing both positive and negative effects (e.g., Caniëls & Rietzschel, 20”