Leading to Make a Difference: A Field Experiment on the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership, Perceived Social Impact, and Public Service Motivation
By N. Bellé. 2014
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e0b82f20f9d40d062ab829dbe786212ee0e1a68
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Adam M. Grant
- M. Bolino
- Sharon K. Parker
- N. Bellé
- Caroline Knight
- Alexander Newman
- N. Eva
- L. B. Andersen
In Public Administration
- M. Bolino
- N. Bellé
- Adam M. Grant
- Sharon K. Parker
- L. B. Andersen
- N. Eva
- Alexander Newman
- Trent Engbers
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Bolino
- Adam M. Grant
- Sharon K. Parker
- N. Bellé
- Alexander Newman
- L. B. Andersen
- Trent Engbers
- Taha Hameduddin
Citations in the corpus
- Activating the Forces of Public Service Motivation: Evidence from a Low‐Intensity Randomized Survey Experiment (2015, unknown): “In line with broader experimental work on PSM (Bellé 2013, 2014; Brewer and Brewer 2011; Christensen et al. 2013), this article contributes to this end.”
- The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations (2016, methodology): “There is also evidence that once employees recognize that their actions benefit others, their prosocial motives are strengthened (Bellé, 2013a; Lemoine et al., 2015), which hints at the prospect of a virtuous cycle.”
- Is Leadership in the Eye of the Beholder?: A study of intended and perceived leadership strategies and organizational performance (2014, methodology): “…leadership and performance using either subjectively measured performance data (Oberfield, 2012; Park & Rainey, 2008; Trottier, Van Wart, & Wang, 2008) or focusing on relatively narrow aspects of objectively performance due to experimental designs (Bellé, 2013; Dvir, Eden, Avolio, & Shamir, 2002).”
- Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership (2019, unknown): “Recent public administration studies (e.g., Bellé, 2014; Andersen & Pallesen, 2008) have confirmed that these strategies can indeed increase goal attainment in public organizations, but the extent to which the strategies affect many other relevant outcomes remains unexplored.”
- Can Public Leadership Increase Public Service Motivation and Job Performance? (2020, methodology): “Previous research showed that PSM is strongly related to social impact perceptions (Bellé 2014).”
- How work redesign interventions affect performance: An evidence-based model from a systematic review (2021, background): “Only three of these studies tested (and confirmed) a mediation relationship between the intervention, changes in work design, and performance (Bellé, 2014; Holman and Axtell, 2016; Grant, 2008a), preventing stronger causal conclusions.”
- Red Tape, Resigned Satisfaction, Public Service Motivation, and Negative Employee Attitudes and Behaviors (2015, background): “Though the sample size and sample selection process is not without precedence (Bellé, 2013; Duffy, Scott, Shaw, Tepper, & Aquino, 2012; Tse, Ashkanasy, & Dasborough, 2012), large sample size and employees belonging to one organization can increase the external validity of our results.”
- Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis (2021, methodology): “To this end, the field has developed a well-established research base on public sector leadership (Fernandez 2004; Van Wart 2014), including dozens of studies on leadership and public service motivation (Andersen et al. 2018; Bell e 2014; Fazzi and Zamaro 2016).”
- Performance-Related Pay and the Crowding Out of Motivation in the Public Sector: A Randomized Field Experiment (2015, background): “Th e use of monetary incentives in the public sector does not seem to be declining; on the contrary, it seems to have enjoyed a recent resurgence in interest and popularity (Bellé and Cantarelli 2014; Bellé and Ongaro 2014; Perry, Engbers, and Jun 2009).”