Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical re‐assessment of the Allinson‐Hayes Cognitive Style Index

By G. Hodgkinson, E. Sadler‐Smith. 2003

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e0ade8c8fc2b3ad133271cce67a3abad5bae282

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of intuition and improvisation in project management (2006, background): “The rational and intuitive systems, and the extent to which an individual relies upon one or the other, may be thought of as preferred ways of processing information and decision making (sometimes referred to as cognitive styles or thinking styles [ 33 ]).”
Team intuition as a continuum construct and new product creativity: The role of environmental turbulence, team experience, and stress (2011, background): “…topic in the strategic management (Khatri and Ng, 2000; Elbanna and Child, 2007; Dane and Pratt, 2007), human resource management (Andersen, 2000; Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith, 2003), marketing management (Wierenga, 2006), and project management literature (Leybourne and Sadler-Smith, 2006).”
Entrepreneurial Cognition, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Capability in the Creative Industries (2011, result): “This is consistent with the complex perspective proposed by Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith (2003) and contrary to the unitary perspective advocated and adhered to by Allinson, Hayes and their co-researchers (Allinson and Hayes, 1996; Hayes et al., 2003).”
Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review (2004, result): “Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith (2003) drew attention to bias in the item-parcelling procedure used in earlier studies and, after exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with large samples (total n=939), reported unequivocal support for a model with analysis and intuition as two moderately correlat”
Intuition in Management Research: A Historical Review (2012, unknown): “psycho-phenomenology, Critical Incident Technique, Experience Sampling Methods, and Day Reconstruction Method), and readers are referred to Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith (2011) for a critical review of methods available for investigating intuition.”
Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research (2012, unknown): “Consistent with a non-unitary conceptualization of style (Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith 2003) individuals may score high or low on the three CoSI dimensions, thereby offering a flexible approach to style assessment (Miron et al.”
Cognitive Style and the Management of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (2004, background): “…in that it allows for the possibility of cognitive versatility as a result of a combination of rational and intuitive as well as local and global processing (see Pondy 1983), and has been empirically verified with respect to rational and intuitive styles (Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith 2003).”
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria (2006, unknown): “….90 cutoff, including ∆χ2 tests of nested models (e.g., Houkes, Janssen, & de Jonge, 2003; Plomplun & Omar, 2003), the normed fit index (NFI; e.g., Hodgkinson & Sadler-Smith, 2003; Penley, Wiebe, & Nwosu, 2003), the χ2 statistic (e.g., McCue, Martin, & Buchanan, 2003), and its sensitivity to…”