Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research
By S. Armstrong, E. Cools, E. Sadler‐Smith. 2012
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In line with increased attention on the application of cognitive approaches to industrial, work and organizational psychology, the last 40 years have witnessed a growing interest in application of the cognitive style construct to the field of business and management. The purpose of this paper is threefold. First, we wish to advance understanding of cognitive styles research by elucidating trends and perspectives related to business and management. Second, we identify gaps in the literature and promising areas of research that can be further developed. This is accomplished by means of a review of papers published between 1969 and 2009. Eight themes emerged from our analysis: (a) vocational and occupational issues; (b) national culture; (c) teamwork and interpersonal relationships; (d) learning; (e) decision making; (f) creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship; (g) sales and marketing; and (h) management information systems, information management and use. Third, we identify valid and reliable methods of assessment of cognitive style for use in business and management settings. Finally we draw a number of conclusions regarding the current state of cognitive styles research and promising directions for future research.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cc05e5d4718217956dcb4c8480c695eab6adb48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs (2015, background): “Cognitive style refers to consistent individual differences in perceiving, behaving, solving problems, taking decisions and relating to others (Armstrong et al., 2012).”