When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors

By A. Luksyte, Christiane Spitzmueller. 2016

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37d4bb8e4cd999b4c4f8b5ee99706374584883d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Michael B. Harari
2. Archana Manapragada
3. Yang Chen
4. Guiyao Tang
5. Fang Lee Cooke
6. C. Viswesvaran
7. Bingjie Yu

In Gender Studies

1. Fang Lee Cooke
2. C. Viswesvaran
3. Sari Mansour
4. Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Yang Chen
2. Michael B. Harari
3. Guiyao Tang
4. Archana Manapragada
5. Fang Lee Cooke
6. C. Viswesvaran
7. Bingjie Yu
8. A. Cohen

Citations in the corpus

• High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organisational support and devolved management (2017, background): “In contrast, employees who perceive their organisations as relatively unsupportive tend to believe that their organisations do not appreciate their creative input (Luksyte and Spitzmueller, 2016), and thus invest less effort in creative behaviour.”
• Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification (2017, background): “This involves more clearly mapping the construct's nomological network, developing a clearer understanding of its correlates (Hu et al., 2015; Liu, Luksyte, Zhou, Shi, &Wang, 2015; Luksyte & Spitzmueller, 2016; Maynard, Joseph, &Maynard, 2006).”