Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers: A Meta-Analysis with Implications for Practice.
By Nancy Scammacca, Greg Roberts, S. Vaughn, M. Edmonds, J. Wexler, C. Reutebuch, J. Torgesen. 2007
276 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37a141f38f53a510f2b2a09b37ea0ea73e321552
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Vaughn
- Alan C. K. Cheung
- Jeanne Wanzek
- R. Slavin
- Shawn Kent
- Michael J. Kieffer
- Xinhua Zheng
- L. Flynn
Citations in the corpus
- Extensive Reading Interventions for Students With Reading Difficulties After Grade 3 (2013, background): “Related to the Edmonds et al. (2009) synthesis are the findings from a metaanalysis Scammacca et al. (2007) conducted to address a range of reading outcomes from reading interventions for struggling students (including students with LD) in Grades 4 to 12.”
- Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading With Middle School Students* (2011, unknown): “…2009; Gajria, Jitendra, Sood, & Sacks, 2007; Gersten et al., 2001; Mastropieri et al., 1996; Matropieri, Scruggs, & Graetz, 2003; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000; Scammacca et al., 2007; Swanson et al., 1999; Talbott, Lloyd, and Tankersley, 1994; Vaughn et al., 2000).”
- Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a Latent Class Analysis (2011, background): “Collectively, these data are being characterized as one of the most pressing crises facing the educational system in the U.S. (Deshler, 2006; Kamil et al., 2008; Scammacca et al., 2007).”
- Engaging Struggling Adolescent Readers to Improve Reading Skills (2017, background): “, 2008), however, the impacts of existing multicomponent interventions have often been modest, especially when moved to scale in lowperforming schools and with teacher, rather than researcher, implementation (Edmonds et al., 2009; Scammacca et al., 2007; Solis, Miciak, Vaughn, & Fletcher, 2014; Wanz”
- Enhancing Social Studies Vocabulary and Comprehension for Seventh-Grade English Language Learners: Findings From Two Experimental Studies (2009, background): “The finding from this study are consistent with conclusions reached in a recent meta-analysis (Scammacca et al., 2007) that reported positive outcomes for monolingual students from vocabulary interventions in which gains on vocabulary were tested on the words students were taught.”
- Instructing Struggling Older Readers: A Selective Meta–Analysis of Intervention Research (2012, background): “Prior research reviews have shown a disparity between effects of intervention on older readers identified using researcher-developed measures of reading and norm-referenced measures (e.g., Edmonds et al., 2009; Scammacca et al., 2007).”
- Building a House on Sand: Why Disciplinary Literacy Is Not Sufficient to Replace General Strategies for Adolescent Learners Who Struggle (2012, methodology): “…Reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension 6–12 29 Wanzek et al. (2010) Reading Reading interventions for struggling readers 4–5 24 Scammacca et al. (2007) Reading Practical guide: Interventions for struggling adolescent readers 4–11 31 Graham & Perin (2007) Writing Writing…”
- The Relationship Between Component Skills and Writing Quality and Production Across Developmental Levels (2016, methodology): “Thus, the decision was made to combine samples of students in Grade 4 and above for moderator analyses; this grade level range has been used in several recent meta-analyses in the area of reading and writing (e.g., Graham & Perin, 2007; Scammacca et al., 2007; Wanzek et al., 2013).”
- Evidence–Based Strategies for Reading Instruction of Older Students with Learning Disabilities (2008, background): “The Scammacca et al. (2007) review of this research found that the fluency interventions examined for older students had a very small effect on students’ improved reading rate and accuracy ( g = .26, n = 4, 95 percent CI = − .08, .61) and virtually no effect on standardized measures of reading…”
- How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education (2016, methodology): “For example, Scammacca et al. (2007) carried out a meta-analysis to examine effective reading interventions for adolescent struggling readers.”