The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.
By H. Roediger III, Andrew C. Butler. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2011
1,671 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/367e75211fd27cbdd2fca17360eae8d907f99d62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- John Dunlosky
- Megan A. Smith
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- Sean H. K. Kang
- Katherine A. Rawson
- Robert A. Bjork
- Nate Kornell
- Kalif E. Vaughn
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- John Dunlosky
- Sean H. K. Kang
- Megan A. Smith
- Katherine A. Rawson
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- Robert A. Bjork
- Aloysius Jia Lun Koh
- Sze Chi Lee
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- John Dunlosky
- Katherine A. Rawson
- Sean H. K. Kang
- Robert A. Bjork
- Aloysius Jia Lun Koh
- Sze Chi Lee
- Stephen Wee Hun Lim
- Megan A. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. (2013, methodology): “Second, as mentioned previously, tests produce more learning than does similar time spent studying without being tested (e.g., Roediger & Butler 2011).”
- Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding (2012, background): “In a recent review, Roediger and Butler (2011) summarized the general elaboration perspective: ‘‘One idea is that retrieval of information from memory leads to elaboration of the memory trace and/or the creation of additional retrieval routes, which makes it more likely that the information will be…”
- How Retrieval Attempts Affect Learning: A Review and Synthesis (2016, background): “Retrieval practice, or attempting to recall a piece of information from memory, typically produces more learning than not studying, and more impressively, it also produces more learning than restudying (see Roediger & Butler, 2011).”
- The restless engram: consolidations never end. (2012, background): “This could well be the contribution of reconsolidation to success in the classroom (Roediger & Butler 2011).”
- ANALYZING THE EFFICACY OF THE TESTING EFFECT USING KAHOOTTM ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE (2017, background): “Roediger and Butler (2011b) have identified five points regarding the testing effect.”
- The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis (2018, background): “This demonstrated the benefits of retrieval practice on longer term retention of educationally relevant knowledge (see, also, Carpenter, 2012; Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013; Karpicke, 2012; Rawson & Dunlosky, 2012; Roediger & Butler, 2011).”
- When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning? (2012, background): “Roediger et al. (2011) found similar effects with younger learners.”