Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding
By Jeffrey D. Karpicke, Megan A. Smith. 2012
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c3f05f6258fec027a5f3228f7d69586e6e8831e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jane Blunt
- A. Efklides
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- Michelle L. Rivers
- H. Roediger III
- P. Agarwal
- Megan A. Smith
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jane Blunt
- A. Efklides
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- Michelle L. Rivers
- P. Agarwal
- H. Roediger III
- Megan A. Smith
- Aloysius Jia Lun Koh
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Retrieval-Based Learning: A Perspective for Enhancing Meaningful Learning (2012, unknown): “Repeatedly retrieving words during initial learning, which amounted to only two or three extra retrievals in this experiment, produced about a 150 % improvement in longterm retention (see also Karpicke and Bauernschmidt 2011; Karpicke and Smith 2012).”
- Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. (2014, background): “For example, Karpicke and Smith (2012) found that retrieval practice produced superior long-term retention relative to imagery-based and verbal elaborative study methods (see too Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).”
- How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach (2014, background): “The benefits of retrieval practice were further shown by Karpicke and Smith (2012), who compared retrieval practice with restudying that was accompanied by elaborative study conditions.”