When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?
By Katherine A. Rawson, John Dunlosky. 2012
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e9183003d47b48624a47e330bd7071ad1e47bf9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning (2020, background): “Accurate monitoring is important because decisions about what, when, and how to study (i.e., control processes) are informed by learners’ perceptions of their own learning process (e.g., Metcalfe & Finn 2008; Dunlosky & Rawson, 2012; Thiede and Dunlosky 1999; Thiede et al. 2003).”
- Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age? (2020, background): “Whereas generating a prediction requires retrieving prior knowledge, learning from a prediction requires processing feedback on that prediction (Vaughn and Rawson 2012).”
- The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis (2018, background): “This demonstrated the benefits of retrieval practice on longer term retention of educationally relevant knowledge (see, also, Carpenter, 2012; Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013; Karpicke, 2012; Rawson & Dunlosky, 2012; Roediger & Butler, 2011).”