A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice

By James M. LeBreton, M. Hargis, Brian Griepentrog, F. Oswald, Robert E. Ployhart. 2007

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d08781f0b3e9651f9941af38957c57c24250f32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. A. Minbashian
2. A. Rafferty
3. H. Zacher
4. C. Rudolph
5. Michael S. Cole
6. Scott Tonidandel
7. James M. LeBreton
8. B. Wille

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Rudolph
2. H. Zacher
3. Michael S. Cole
4. Scott Tonidandel
5. Anne‐Kathrin Kleine
6. Reeshad S. Dalal
7. Bradley J. Brummel
8. R. Kaiser

In Social Psychology

1. C. Rudolph
2. H. Zacher
3. R. Kaiser
4. James M. LeBreton
5. Michael S. Cole
6. Scott Tonidandel
7. Michael A. Baysinger
8. Anne‐Kathrin Kleine

Citations in the corpus

• RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses (2014, methodology): “RelWeight’’ provides estimates of variable importance using the metric of relative effect sizes (LeBreton et al. 2007).”
• A Measure of Variations in Internal Social Capital among Family Firms (2011, background): “In Table 5, we provide information on each predictor’s relative importance, defined as “the contribution each predictor makes to the R2, considering both its unique contribution and its contribution in the presence of the other predictors” (LeBreton et al., 2007, p. 477).”
• Cognitive beliefs and positive emotions about change: Relationships with employee change readiness and change-supportive behaviors (2018, background): “We also acknowledge the differences between the standard analyses, which are designed to assess incremental importance, and relative weights analyses, which is designed to assess relative importance (see LeBreton et al., 2007).”