A measurement scale for product innovation performance

By Joaquín Alegre, Rafael Lapiedra, Ricardo Chiva. 2006

435 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/289a5634a4aa8120699776ad595eefba047eca39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test (2008, methodology): “However, this link needs a wider and more comprehensive analysis, including the main characteristics that foster organizational learning (Argote et al., 2003; Bueno and Ordoñez, 2004; Koc and Ceylan, 2006). Calantone et al. (2002) defined a firm’s learning orientation as the organizational activitie”
The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment (2011, methodology): “After reviewing the scales reported in the literature for measuring innovation performance (Booz, Allen and Hamilton 1982 ; OECD/Eurostat 1997 ; Avlonitis, Papastathopoulou and Gounaris 2001 ; Darroch and Jardine 2002 ; Darroch 2003 ; Alegre, Lapiedra and Chiva 2006 ), a measure was devised on”
Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms (2011, background): “Firms that offer new products, adapted to the needs and wants of target customers, are in a better position to obtain higher performance and create sustainable competitive advantage (Prahalad and Hamel 1990; Nonaka and Takeuchi 1995; Alegre et al. 2006).”
Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data (2020, background): “According to Alegre, Lapiedra, and Chiva (2006), innovation performance can be decomposed into innovation efficacy and innovation efficiency.”
The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach (2019, background): “Product innovation performance involves two dimensions: efficiency (PIP_EFFICI) and efficacy (PIP_EFFICA) [50].”
Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees’ job satisfaction: A mathematical model and empirical research (2010, positive): “…assessing the extent to which R&D managers or employees are concerned with issues such as volume, speed, and time to release on the market of new products, were adopted from Alegre et al. (2006), Garcia and Calantone (2002), Li et al. (2007), van den Berghe and Guild (2008), and Wong et al. (2008).”
The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: Evidence from Malaysia (2013, background): “However, the previous studies inclined to focus on one or two dimensions of innovation, such as product innovation (Alegre et al., 2006; Espallardo and Ballester, 2009; Zhang and Duan, 2010; Bakar and Ahmad, 2010), product and process innovation (Georgellis et al.”