Enhancing Core Mathematics Instruction for Students at Risk for Mathematics Disabilities

46 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reaching the Mountaintop: Addressing the Common Core Standards in Mathematics for Students with Mathematics Difficulties (2013, background): “…decisions about which validated practices to use for instruction on foundational skills as they relate to a cluster or standard, researchers have determined several best practices for instruction for students with MD (Archer & Hughes, 2011; Doabler et al., 2011; Fuchs, Fuchs, Powell, et al., 2008).”
Explicit Mathematics Instruction (2013, background): “In particular, explicit instruction provides a format to facilitate high-quality instructional interactions among teachers and students around critical math content (Doabler et al., 2012).”
Evaluating Three Elementary Mathematics Programs for Presence of Eight Research-Based Instructional Design Principles (2012, methodology): “To optimize student understanding, textbooks should provide clear and appropriate teaching examples (Chard & Jungjohann, 2006; Doabler et al., 2012).”
Testing the Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of a Tier 2 Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention (2016, methodology): “RAENS is an individually administered assessment consisting of 32 items.”
Explicit Instruction: Historical and Contemporary Contexts (2017, background): ““Chunks” are taught separately, in a logical sequence, to reduce cognitive complexity and load (Archer & Hughes, 2011; Doabler et al., 2012).”