The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations

By Amy J. C. Cuddy, Peter Glick, Anna S. Beninger. 2011

692 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21bca1b370326e63d84001ac1a95476409324350

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research (2020, background): “This research suggests that our impressions are driven by the perceptions of the counterpart as having good intentions (warmth) and the ability to pursue the intentions (competence; Cuddy, Glick, & Beninger, 2011).”
Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism (2016, background): “…with brands can be explained by the same main dimensions as their perceptions of people: warmth and competence, two universal dimensions of social cognition, which are able to explain both interpersonal and intergroup relationships (Becker and Asbrock 2012; Cuddy, Glick, and Beninger 2011).”
The Relational Nature of Leadership Identity Construction: How and When It Influences Perceived Leadership and Decision-Making (2015, background): “Stronger leadership evaluations – and their association with greater competence – signal effectiveness, warranting follower support (Cuddy et al., 2011; Hogg, 2001), and leaders are often afforded positive characteristics (e.g., prestige, heroism) that boost their influence on others (Meindl,…”
Attracting applicants through the organization's social media page: Signaling employer brand personality (2019, methodology): “We operationalized employer brand personality as warmth and competence, two dimensions that emerged in several research domains (Cuddy et al., 2011; Fiske et al., 2002).”
"Michael Can't Read!" Teachers' Gender Stereotypes and Boys' Reading Self-Concept. (2015, result): “This is in line with research on the effects of incompetence stereotypes: Groups perceived as incompetent are ignored or excluded more than other groups (Cuddy et al., 2011).”
The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance (2017, background): “Competence and warmth are often seen as negatively related, particularly in the case of female leaders (Cuddy et al., 2011).”
Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “In case the member is unwilling, perceiving members may falsely place their trust in a target member, who may abuse that trust to pursue personal gain (Cuddy et al., 2011).”
Examining the effects of robots' physical appearance, warmth, and competence in frontline services: The Humanness‐Value‐Loyalty model (2021, background): “The two dimensions account for almost 80% of people's descriptions of a person in a first impression (Cuddy et al., 2011).”
The stigma of affirmative action: : A stereotyping- based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. (2014, positive): “…as the primary dimensions of stereotype content, the SCM also specifies the conditions under which individuals form competence- and warmth-based stereotypes about others, as well the consequences of these stereotypes (e.g., Cuddy, Fiske, & Glick, 2007; Cuddy et al., 2011; Fiske et al., 2002).”
Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition (2014, background): “children, or men (fathers or not); but in home contexts where communion is the salient dimension, working mothers are seen as more communal than women who have no children (Cuddy et al., 2011).”