Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets.

By S. Fox, Paul E. Spector. 2005

450 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/218d56183736b49cffd9d556724f05d0d1af526b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors (2015, background): “It might be interesting to determine whether servant leadership leads to less frequent antisocial behaviors through increased normative commitment when employee reports of their own antisocial behaviors are used—even if self-reports of antisocial behaviors also have limitations (Bordia et al. 2008; ”
The role of justice and social exchange relationships in workplace deviance: Test of a mediated model (2010, background): “job/employee attitudes, justice, organizations, social exchange, supervisors, workplace deviance Workplace deviance has attracted much research attention during the last decade (Bennett and Robinson, 2003; Fox and Spector, 2005; Giacalone and Greenberg, 1997; LanganFox et al., 2007).”
Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness (2012, background): “…work behavior Guilt proneness Unethical behavior Morality Personality Individual differences Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) is volitional behavior that harms or intends to harm organizations or people in organizations (Fox and Spector 2005; Spector 2011; Spector et al. 2006, 2010).”
Researching Rudeness: The Past, Present, and Future of the Science of Incivility (2017, background): “Problematizing this perspective (Fox & Spector, 2005; Hershcovis & Reich, 2013), scholars have argued that roles should be viewed as fluid, wherein an individual might be targeted with incivility at one point, instigate incivility at another, and later become a target once more.”
The Many Roles of Control in a Stressor-Emotion Theory of Counterproductive Work Behavior (2006, methodology): “Autonomy has typically been measured with the component from Hackman and Oldham’s (1975) Job Diagnostic Survey or JDS, which has been shown to correlate with stress-related responses, such as anxiety, intention of quitting the job, job satisfaction, and physical symptoms (e.”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Emotional Exhaustion (2009, background): “…decade, issues pertaining to “negative behaviors” in organizations have gained researchers’ interest (Griffin & Lopez, 2005), such as counterproductive work behavior (Fox & Spector, 2005), organizational misbehavior (Vardi & Wiener, 1996), and deviant workplace behaviors (Robinson & Bennett, 1995).”
The job demands–resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect (2011, methodology): “CWB may entail extremely negative consequences for organizations (see Fox & Spector, 2005), for example high conflict levels triggered by abusive/hostile behaviour.”
Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective (2010, background): “North American researchers, on the other hand, have primarily framed bullying behaviours as a form of aggression in the workplace (Neuman and Baron, 2003), as a form of deviant or dysfunctional workplace behaviour (Robinson, 2008), as a form of counterproductive workplace behaviour (Fox and Spector,”
Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance (2013, background): “Workplace deviance has attracted much research attention during the last decade (Fox and Spector, 2005; Langan-Fox et al., 2007).”